![]() |
Enron Mail |
Lelie: I saw your note about AB 78X, and have been in touch with the staff
of the author's office about the bill. Its scope is very narrow, and does not change the rights of the existing utilities to construct facilities using eminent domain. The gas and electric utilities were already exempted from the requirement of PU Code 625 to hold an additional eminent domain hearing. This exemption applies to all of their transmission and distribution facilities. Essentially, the existing law only requires the extra hearing for independent storage companies, like Wild Goose (also a client of mine) and Lodi, or someone who wants to build a CPUC jurisdictional intrastate pipeline. Interstates are, of course, FERC certificated and derive eminent domain authority elsewhere than in the PU Code. So this bill merely places the independent storage providers on the same footing as the utilities. I do not see any competitive disadvantage vis a vis marketers such as Enron. Please let me know if you have any further questions. Mike Day
|