|
|
Enron Mail |
Richard --
Can you please send a copy to Sandi McCubbin? Why don't we discuss how to pass along on the Tuesday CA call. Jim ---------------------- Forwarded by James D Steffes/NA/Enron on 05/07/2001 08:06 AM --------------------------- Steven J Kean 05/06/2001 03:26 PM To: Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Sandra McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron Subject: Re: Hendricks I think we should let people in the legislature know about this and see if one or more of them can get their hands on it. From: Richard B Sanders@ECT on 05/06/2001 10:40 AM To: James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Sandra McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron cc: Subject: Hendricks Any thoughts? ----- Forwarded by Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT on 05/06/2001 10:39 AM ----- "Michael Kirby" <mlk@pkns.com< 05/04/2001 06:00 PM To: <Richard.b.sanders@enron.com< cc: <Gfergus@brobeck.com<, <Rgibbs@gibbs-.com<, "David Noonan" <djn@pkns.com< Subject: Hendricks The complaint,albeit brief, filed May 1 in San Diego Superior Court by Strategy Integration, Inc versus Michael Aguirre and the other Hendricks plaintiffs' attorneys is quite extraordinary in its disclosure. A hard copy is being faxed. The expert firm alleges they were "retained...to explain, research, and investigate potential claims of gaming and collusion by energy providers who supply electricity to the California Energy Market ...[and] ...retained to perform utility and energy consulting services." After alleging that the Hendricks attorneys "refused to pay Plaintiffs' first billing" it is alleged that"defendants' refusal may have resulted from the conclusions Plaintiff drew in its analysis." We should consider if there is there a way to get this filing to Senator Dunn's office or a more friendly Senator without identifying us as the source,.They can see what some expert in the field hired by the plaintiffs' class action lawyers apparently concluded on their own about the claims of gaming and collusion. I suspect that Sen Dunn has no interest but some Republican Senator might have some use for it. It could have some value if the hearings go forward. This is not urgent timewise but I wanted to bring it to your attention. The information contained in this e-mail message and any accompanying documents is subject to the attorney-client privilege and/or the attorney work product rule and is confidential business information intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or representative of the recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the Systems Administrator at admin@pkns.com and immediately delete this message from your system.
|