Enron Mail

From:richard.shapiro@enron.com
To:sandra.mccubbin@enron.com
Subject:Re: Possible Messages on Legislation in California
Cc:jeff.dasovich@enron.com, steven.kean@enron.com, james.steffes@enron.com,rob.bradley@enron.com, mpalmer@enron.com, karen.denne@enron.com, mona.petrochko@enron.com, susan.mara@enron.com, paul.kaufman@enron.com, samuel.wehn@enron.com, tim.belden@enron.co
Bcc:jeff.dasovich@enron.com, steven.kean@enron.com, james.steffes@enron.com,rob.bradley@enron.com, mpalmer@enron.com, karen.denne@enron.com, mona.petrochko@enron.com, susan.mara@enron.com, paul.kaufman@enron.com, samuel.wehn@enron.com, tim.belden@enron.co
Date:Sat, 2 Sep 2000 07:26:00 -0700 (PDT)

We need to all talk Tuesday morning ASAP - I am frankly sick and tired of
self-delusion in the face of a stark and bleak reality in Sacramento- As a
Democrat, it is clear to me that the Democrats from Gray on down are a lost
cause( their response, from a public policy perspective, is shameful in its
shortsidedness and contemptible in its lack of thoughtfulness and intellect-
the Democrat's response in Cal. makes me ashamed to call myself a Democrat)
and the Republicans too small a minority in Ca. to make a difference- From my
vantage point ,nothing good and some( potentially much) bad came out of the
three bills passed. We have a huge uphill battle coming in the next session
and the prospects of further thoughtless retrenchment on the part of the
Governor and legislature very high- to begin the preperation for that
struggle, we first have to be honest with ourselves and end any petty
bickering internally on intrepretations of brutally clear events and
oucomes, events and outcomes which are the equivalent of getting hit upside
the head by a 2 by 4, i.e; that usually does'nt require intrepretation or
discussion as to whether it hurt... We end the self-delusion starting on
Tuesday. Jeff- please arrange the call - all are invited .




Sandra McCubbin
09/02/2000 01:44 PM
To: Jeff Dasovich/SFO/EES@EES
cc: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Richard Shapiro/HOU/EES@EES, James D
Steffes/HOU/EES@EES, Rob Bradley/Corp/Enron@ENRON, mpalmer@enron.com, Karen
Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mona L Petrochko/SFO/EES@EES, Susan J
Mara/SFO/EES@EES, Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT Dave Parquet, Samuel
Wehn/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Possible Messages on Legislation in California

since the siting legislation created only a program that is voluntary and not
in place of the existing laws, and we have a committment from the
legislature, the CEC and the govenor's office to take another shot in
January, as they know that this legislation is flawed, too many conflicting
interests trying to solve a complex problem in too short a time, I feel this
is too harsh...we have already started the process of creating new
legislation, that will be as close to a consensus as possible for next
session..this legislation did not hurt us, and, some companies feel that they
can use the processes. We have to keep in mind that with the knowledge that
there will be major reorganization legislation next year, we don't want to
offend the friends that we have in Sacramento, particularly the Republicans
who were the ones who insisted on an expedited siting bill