Enron Mail

From:sandra.mccubbin@enron.com
To:jeff.dasovich@enron.com
Subject:Re: Possible Messages on Legislation in California
Cc:steven.kean@enron.com, richard.shapiro@enron.com, james.steffes@enron.com,rob.bradley@enron.com, mpalmer@enron.com, karen.denne@enron.com, mona.petrochko@enron.com, susan.mara@enron.com, paul.kaufman@enron.com, samuel.wehn@enron.com
Bcc:steven.kean@enron.com, richard.shapiro@enron.com, james.steffes@enron.com,rob.bradley@enron.com, mpalmer@enron.com, karen.denne@enron.com, mona.petrochko@enron.com, susan.mara@enron.com, paul.kaufman@enron.com, samuel.wehn@enron.com
Date:Sat, 2 Sep 2000 06:44:00 -0700 (PDT)

since the siting legislation created only a program that is voluntary and not
in place of the existing laws, and we have a committment from the
legislature, the CEC and the govenor's office to take another shot in
January, as they know that this legislation is flawed, too many conflicting
interests trying to solve a complex problem in too short a time, I feel this
is too harsh...we have already started the process of creating new
legislation, that will be as close to a consensus as possible for next
session..this legislation did not hurt us, and, some companies feel that they
can use the processes. We have to keep in mind that with the knowledge that
there will be major reorganization legislation next year, we don't want to
offend the friends that we have in Sacramento, particularly the Republicans
who were the ones who insisted on an expedited siting bill