|
|
Enron Mail |
The attached note is from Enron's hired lobbyist in Sacramento. Looks like the only thing that is going to happen will be a Budget without anything on energy restructuring (could continue to change).
There will be some additional negotiating on SBX2 78 over the recess. Enron is looking for a way into those discussions (Jeff Dasovich). We will try to push good language on DA dates and assignment of Utility and CDWR costs. On another note, CDWR has announced its revenue requirements going forward. The numbers are significantly less than had previously been expected (due to lower costs for spot market purchases). The end result, if their figures are correct, is that the March 27 3c/kwh increase would be sufficient going forward (we are trying to validate). The key is that now the Retained Generation proceedings will determine if any more $ is needed from retail customers. Thanks, Jim -----Original Message----- From: "Scott Govenar" <sgovenar@govadv.com<@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Scott+20Govenar+22+20+3Csgovenar+40govadv+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com] Sent: Monday, July 23, 2001 1:55 PM To: Sharma, Ban; Leboe, David; Eric Letke; Thome, Jennifer; Ken Smith; Bev Hansen; Hedy Govenar; Buster, Miyung; Guerrero, Janel; Robert Frank; Mike Day; Lawner, Leslie; Kingerski, Harry; Karen Denne; Kean, Steven J.; Alan Comnes; Susan J Mara; Kaufman, Paul; Jeff Dasovich; Steffes, James D.; Rick Shapiro Subject: MOU UPDATE For those of you who don't already know, the Senate passed its version of the SCE MOU, SBX2 78 (Polanco/Sher) which requires users over 500 kw to foot the bill for SCE's entire undercollection and it eliminates DA completely. This largely represents TURN's proposal. The Senate also passed a budget and has since adjourned until August 20. The Assembly had been considering two MOUs, ABX 82 (Keeley) and ABX 50 (Wright). Both bills had difficulty attracting a majority of votes given their different approaches to dealing with SCE. ABX 82 for example, had large users picking up most of the tab for SCE's undercollection whereas ABX 50 split those charges among all users. Both bills provided for some type of direct access and ABX 82 also provided for a purchase of the transmission system. In light of the difficulty in passing either bill, it appears as if the Assembly will shelve both proposals today in order to amend SBX 78 over the summer break. An internal legislative working group may be formed to draft amendments but this has not been confirmed. Large users have begun drafting extensive amendments recognizing that in its current form SBX 78 has very little to offer. The Assembly will try to pass the final portion of the budget today and recess until August 20.
|