|
|
Enron Mail |
Jim, et al,
Interesting e-mail from UC. Apparently the PUC is implying to UC that DASRs submitted after July 1 need to be associated with a contract executed prior to July 1. Is this consistent with our intell? Can they make these inquiries? Please advise. Tom < -----Original Message----- < From: Maric Munn <Maric.munn@ucop.edu<@ENRON@EES < Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 9:38 PM < To: TRiley@enron.com; dhuddles@enron.com < Cc: mgutheinz@calstate.edu; KTilton <ktilton@gralegal.com< < Subject: Fwd: Enron DASRs filed since July 1, 2001 < < Tom, Diann - < < Do you have data on number of DASRs that have been submitted for UC/CSU < accounts post July 1, 2001. DO you also have a breakdown of number of < DASRs that were for accounts that were part of the original group of < accounts that were un-DASRd and re-DASRd vs. the number of DASRs for the < accounts that were being DASR'd for the first time? Read below - < enquiring < minds at the CPUC want to know. < < Thanks < < Maric < < < <X-Sent: 30 Aug 2001 00:13:56 GMT < <Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2001 17:03:09 -0700 < <From: KTilton <ktilton@gralegal.com< < <X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.51 [en] (Win98; I) < <X-Accept-Language: en,pdf < <To: Maric Munn <Maric.Munn@ucop.edu<, Mark Gutheinz < <mgutheinz@calstate.edu< < <CC: Irene Moosen <imoosen@gralegal.com< < <Subject: Enron DASRs filed since July 1, 2001 < < < <Maric, Mark: < < < <Our office has received telephone calls from CPUC Energy Division staff < <regarding the Enron DASRs filed since July 1, 2001, and specifically < <whether recent DASRs filed are under an existing contract - that was < <executed prior to July 1 (as opposed to new Direct access contracts, < <post July 1). The Energy Division staff is being asked by their < <superiors to determine how many of the post-July 1 DASRs (for all < <customers, not just UC/CSU) were under an existing contract versus a < <new, post-July 1 contract. As you know, this relates to the revised < <draft decision which suspends direct access effective July 1. < < < <We have explained that the new Enron DASRs for the campuses are under an < <existing contract - the original contract that was executed in 1998. But < <one energy staff member has requested a specific number of post-July 1 < <Enron DASRs filed for the campuses - as they were returned to direct < <access service under the contract. Therefore, I am making this request < <from you. < < < <Can you provide me with the following information: < < 1. How many DASRs have been filed since July 1, 2001 < < 2. Of those, how many were inappropriately removed from direct < <access back in February and how many were eligible, but never placed on < <direct access service due to Enron mistake? < <I will use discretion in sharing the precise breakdown information on < <the post-July 1 DASRs, but it is important that we have a clear < <understanding of the precise numbers. < < < <Please let me know if you have any questions on this matter. I realize < <that you are both busy, and I appreciate your attention to this matter. < < < <thanks < < < <Kelly < <
|