Enron Mail

From:jeff.dasovich@enron.com
To:jeff.dasovich@enron.com
Subject:
Cc:
Bcc:
Date:Thu, 27 Sep 2001 18:06:02 -0700 (PDT)

Here's a cut at the taxonomy of regulatory risks associated with Direct Access. Please let me know if there are others I missed, or if there are changes needed to the ones listed.


1. Retroactive Suspension of DA Contracts: The PUC rules in a subsequent decision that DA is suspended on some date between July 1 and September 20th.

2. Contract renewal forbidden: The PUC includes contract renewal under the suspension of DA.

3. No incremental "DASR'ing": The PUC includes incremental additions and subtractions of DA customer's load under the suspension of DA (e.g., fast food chains, University campus)

4. Cost allocation: the PUC adds new costs to DA accounts and/or disproportionately shifts existing costs to DA accounts. Costs with greatest risk of being shifted to DA customers include: IOU undercollection, bonds to repay the state general fund, and DWR contracts. The costs associated with these categories are substantial.

Key risks associated with each category:
Adverse to P/L
Adverse to hedge (demand risk)