RE:

Yep - I heard the same thing -- no new language out as far as I know but if I get my hands on something I will send it your way.

Thanks,
Delaney

-----Original Message-----
From: Dasovich, Jeff [mailto:Jeff.Dasovich@ENRON.com]
Sent: Monday, August 06, 2001 4:12 PM
To: Delaney Hunter (E-mail)
Subject:

FYI. This is what IEP's lobbyist is saying. Jive with what you're hearing? Any language floating around? Any idea of which issues there is/isn't agreement on?

Best,
Jeff

***************************************************************
Despite the legislative break, on Thursday a working meeting convened to
discuss the Edison MOU and to find common ground for potential legislation
in the Assembly. Rick Simpson on behalf of Speaker Hertzberg and Assembly
Members Keeley, Dutra, Goldberg, Wright, Steinberg (by phone) as well as
staff from other offices participated. A representative from the State
Treasurer's office was also present. We have touched base with a variety of
sources and believe that no issues were finally resolved during the
discussion; however there seems to have been general agreement on some
issues and staff has been asked to draft language attempting to memorialize
those agreement points in time for the group to consider the language at its
next meeting early next week.

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise. Thank you.
**********************************************************************