Enron Mail

From:bruno.gaillard@enron.com
To:jeff.dasovich@enron.com
Subject:Telecom CEQA Review
Cc:
Bcc:
Date:Fri, 11 Feb 2000 05:27:00 -0800 (PST)

The commission has issued a new rulemaking, R. 00-02-003, to address CEQA
review for CLECs.
Parties should file their responses to the following questions no later than
March 15, 2000.

1. Is the Commission's existing practice for authorizing new CLECs adequate
to comply with CEQA and to protect California's environmental resources?
2. Is the Commission's existing policy of allowing incumbent local exchange
carriers and cellular carriers to construct new facilities without
environmental review in compliance with CEQA? Does it promote adequate
protection of California's environmental resources?
3. Do local authorities and other government agencies have adequate
opportunities to protect local environmental resources under the current set
of Commission practices and policies regarding incumbent local exchange
carriers and CLECs? If not, how should this circumstance be remedied?
4. Does the Commission's existing practice for authorizing new CLECs create a
competitive advantage or disadvantage for certain carriers? If so, how might
those disparities be eliminated or reduced?
5. Is the Commission's existing practice for authorizing new long distance
carriers adequate to comply with CEQA and to protect California's
environmental resources?
6. Is the Commission's existing policy of allowing incumbent long distance
carriers to construct new facilities without environmental review in
compliance with CEQA? Does it promote adequate protection of California's
environmental resources?
7. Do local authorities and other government agencies have adequate
opportunities to protect local environmental resources under the current set
of Commission practices and policies regarding long distance carriers? If
not, how should this circumstance be remedied?
8. Does the Commission's existing practice for authorizing new long distance
carriers create a competitive advantage or disadvantage for certain carriers?
If so, how might those disparities be eliminated or reduced?

Are we interested in this proceeding? Attached is a copy of the rulemaking.