|
|
Enron Mail |
For whatever reason, our calls, messages and emails have not received a
response to date. We need to understand the nature of the transaction before we can move forward with the CPUC. We have put them on hold, telling them we are waiting for Edwards to describe what they intend to put out for bid. Can you let me know? ---------------------- Forwarded by William Gang/HOU/EES on 12/02/99 01:03 PM --------------------------- William Gang 11/11/99 10:31 AM To: Mike.keeling@edex.edwards.af.mil cc: Jeff Dasovich/SFO/EES@EES, Robert Frank/HOU/EES@EES, John.lemacks@edex.edwards.af.mil Subject: Electrica Commodity for Edwards AFB Hey, Mike! Is commodity in or out? What's the current thinking? We need to know so we can go forward with the Commission. ---------------------- Forwarded by William Gang/HOU/EES on 11/11/99 08:28 AM --------------------------- William Gang 11/08/99 01:52 PM To: Mike.keeling@edex.edwards.af.mil cc: Jeff Dasovich/SFO/EES@EES, Robert Frank/HOU/EES@EES, Alexis Carroll/HOU/EES@EES Subject: Electrica Commodity for Edwards AFB Mike, attached are the parameters that we would prefer to see in an RFP for the electrical commodity in California. This approach in any RFP would help us get the best bid possible for a solicitation. I understand from our converstaion of last week that Edwards is contemplating adding the electrical commodity to the RFP that is intended to be used for privatization of the Edwards electrical distribution system. Given this, we have put our jurisdictional discussions with the CPUC on hold pending your resolution of the content of the RFP. We cannot request any dispositive action from the commission on jurisdiction until we can accurately characterize the elements of the transaction. Please advise us, as early as possible whether or not the commodity will be included, and if so, how its inclusion will be structured.
|