|
|
Enron Mail |
Cc: d..steffes@enron.com, michael.tribolet@enron.com, wanda.curry@enron.com
Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Bcc: d..steffes@enron.com, michael.tribolet@enron.com, wanda.curry@enron.com X-From: MDay <MDay@GMSSR.com< X-To: Mara, Susan </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=SMARA<, Mellencamp, Lisa </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=LMELLEN<, Dasovich, Jeff </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=JDASOVIC<, Williams, Robert C. </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=RWILLIA2<, MDay <MDay@GMSSR.com<, jbennet@gmssr.com X-cc: Steffes, James D. </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=JSTEFFE<, Tribolet, Michael </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=MTRIBOLE<, Curry, Wanda </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=WCURRY< X-bcc: X-Folder: \JDASOVIC (Non-Privileged)\Dasovich, Jeff\Inbox X-Origin: Dasovich-J X-FileName: JDASOVIC (Non-Privileged).pst Hello all. I am back from the CPUC and available to participate again. As for Sue's concern, I do not believe Edison will say that our payment of PX credit issue (the subject of the complaints) is directly in the "free-for-all" case, but they will assert that that case will resolve the issues related to how to calculate the credit in the post Jan 17 time frame and that once that is decided, Edison will have all the information it needs to pay all the ESPs correctly, as they still intend to pay us on the original methodology for the pre Jan 17 period. Therefore, they will say that once the Commission resolves the free for all issues it will resolve all the issues in the complaint. I should respond to SCE's attorney soon, so we can contact the judge and ask him to take the matter off calendar. Is everyone in accord? Mike Day -----Original Message----- From: Mara, Susan [mailto:Susan.J.Mara@ENRON.com] Sent: Friday, November 02, 2001 12:00 PM To: Mellencamp, Lisa; Dasovich, Jeff; Williams, Robert C.; mday@gmssr.com; jbennet@gmssr.com Cc: Steffes, James D.; Tribolet, Michael; Curry, Wanda Subject: RE: Call Regarding Prehearing Conference on Our Negative CTC complaint I'm concerned about the 2nd bullet. We've been taking the position that we don't want this "payment of PX credit" issue in this proceeding -- the "free-for-all" proceeding. Have we changed our position? If not, I am concerned that Edison will either state directly or give the impression that it's part of the Barnett proceeding. < -----Original Message----- < From: Mellencamp, Lisa < Sent: Friday, November 02, 2001 11:09 AM < To: Dasovich, Jeff; Williams, Robert C.; 'mday@gmssr.com'; < 'jbennet@gmssr.com' < Cc: Steffes, James D.; Tribolet, Michael; Curry, Wanda; Mara, Susan < Subject: RE: Call Regarding Prehearing Conference on Our Negative < CTC complaint < < ok < < -----Original Message----- < From: Dasovich, Jeff < Sent: Friday, November 02, 2001 1:06 PM < To: Dasovich, Jeff; Williams, Robert C.; 'mday@gmssr.com'; < Mellencamp, Lisa; 'jbennet@gmssr.com' < Cc: Steffes, James D.; Tribolet, Michael; Curry, Wanda; < Mara, Susan < Subject: RE: Call Regarding Prehearing Conference on Our < Negative CTC complaint < < OK. Haven't heard back from Bob, but we may be able to avoid < the call. Mike Day got in touch with Edison's attorney this morning < and here's the end result. < < * Edison has agreed to tell the judge on the 7th that, with < respect to the complaints we've filed, they agree to take them off < calendar until and unless parties ask to put them back on calendar. < * Edison will take the view that the proceedings underway at the < commission (and presumably attempts to "settle" with parties) will < resolve the issues in the complaint. < * The assumption from out end is that the status quo remains < intact. That is, we will continue to pay the Commission, not Edison, < for T&D charges during the "time out" on our complaints. < * Mike and Jeanne will make sure that this critical piece, i.e., < that we continue to place payments in escrow, will remain intact as < part of the "time out." If it turns out there are any doubts about < this aspect, we'll likely need regroup and reconsider our options. < < If anyone has any questions or concerns please speak up, and/or < if folks would still like to have a very brief call to discuss, we can < do that and ensure that Bob is kept in the loop and can weigh in when < he returns. < < Comments/thoughts? < < Best, < Jeff < < -----Original Message----- < From: Dasovich, Jeff < Sent: Friday, November 02, 2001 11:30 AM < To: Williams, Robert C.; 'mday@gmssr.com'; < Mellencamp, Lisa < Subject: Call Regarding Prehearing Conference on < Our Negative CTC complaint < < Bob's secretary called to tell me that Bob's at a < doctor's appt and will be back in the office around noon Houston time. < We'll shoot for around noon CST to have the call. I'll conference < folks in from my phone. < < Best, < Jeff ********************************************************************** This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise. Thank you. **********************************************************************
|