Enron Mail

From:thomas.reichelderfer@enron.com
To:jim.badum@enron.com
Subject:Re: Re2: SCE Legislative Language
Cc:roger.yang@enron.com, kelly.cook@enron.com, bruno.gaillard@enron.com,janel.guerrero@enron.com, lisa.mackey@enron.com, jeff.brown@enron.com, douglas.condon@enron.com, martin.wenzel@enron.com, phyllis.anzalone@enron.com, harry.kingerski@enron.com, sus
Bcc:roger.yang@enron.com, kelly.cook@enron.com, bruno.gaillard@enron.com,janel.guerrero@enron.com, lisa.mackey@enron.com, jeff.brown@enron.com, douglas.condon@enron.com, martin.wenzel@enron.com, phyllis.anzalone@enron.com, harry.kingerski@enron.com, sus
Date:Wed, 1 Mar 2000 01:51:00 -0800 (PST)

The proceeding that EGA is currently participating in will hopefully result
in a retail adder that will be equivalent to the actual retail costs of the
utility (which will be unbundled from the distribution rates). Once this
occurs, SCE will not be able to avoid the adder, even for industrial
customers. I think the folks at the utility are over-promising on something
they won't be able to deliver once the CPUC issues its order in the retail
adder proceeding.