|
|
Enron Mail |
Sirs, here is the current draft of the paper.
A couple of notes: (1) Marty, I hacked at your section a bit last night trying to funnel it into a couple of direct hypotheses (I failed). I hope you don't mind my changes (overall structure is the same). Also, should we footnote your references; it looks strange to hit Jeff's section and suddenly have refs footnoted. (2) Mike, I was trying to warm up to conclusion by writing up some of methodology section. Sorry to duplicate effort- you can delete and replace with yours or merge. (3) The survey results/conclusions - I am pretty much ready to go here and expect about 2 hrs of work (that means the complete draft should be in your mail box tomorrow morning). HOWEVER- i am having a hard time framing the results without direct hypotheses to affirm/disaffirm. SO, Marty and Jeff, can you two review the intro section and respond to my note and return your suggestions to me? Please respond to my Haas email and not work, as I may take a couple of hours off during the middle of the day to go work on the paper at school. With the end in sight, Jonathan ********************* * Jonathan Hudacko * * 510.649.6476 (WK) * * 415.305.4293 (HM) * ********************* - E205_paper.doc
|