Enron Mail

From:george.tocquigny@enron.com
To:steve_brunner@missionfoods.com
Subject:Cal. PUC order re: interruptible contracts
Cc:david.duffy@enron.com, evans.swann@enron.com, mitchell.anderson@enron.com,richard.zdunkewicz@enron.com, craig.sutter@enron.com, jeff.dasovich@enron.com
Bcc:david.duffy@enron.com, evans.swann@enron.com, mitchell.anderson@enron.com,richard.zdunkewicz@enron.com, craig.sutter@enron.com, jeff.dasovich@enron.com
Date:Wed, 14 Feb 2001 02:23:00 -0800 (PST)

Steve,
In your absence, I left a voicemail for Guillermo yesterday pertaining to
some information that I'm not certain Gruma was fully aware of when we met
Monday.

Late last month, the CPUC decided to waive interruptible rate program
penalties, except that they "fully expect all interruptible customers to
voluntarily respond to the maximum extent feasible."

In essence, our interpretation is that this makes Gruma's response to an
interruption completely voluntary, however, as we discussed Monday, the
California supply-demand imbalances will remain for some time, and the
utilities will likely resort to rolling black-outs if the now voluntary
interruptions (or other measures) don't relieve the situation. We recommend
that Gruma confirm our interpretation directly with Edison.

I have a hard copy of the CPUC's decision with a brief cover note from
Edison, if you're interested. It's probably also available on a CPUC website.
Please call me if questions, or we can discuss further on our Tuesday
conference call.
George