Enron Mail

From:britt.whitman@enron.com
To:john.lavorato@enron.com, louise.kitchen@enron.com, david.delainey@enron.com
Subject:California Update 6/25/01
Cc:christopher.calger@enron.com, christian.yoder@enron.com,steve.hall@enron.com, mike.swerzbin@enron.com, phillip.allen@enron.com, tim.belden@enron.com, jeff.dasovich@enron.com, chris.gaskill@enron.com, mike.grigsby@enron.com, tim.heizenrader@enron.com
Bcc:christopher.calger@enron.com, christian.yoder@enron.com,steve.hall@enron.com, mike.swerzbin@enron.com, phillip.allen@enron.com, tim.belden@enron.com, jeff.dasovich@enron.com, chris.gaskill@enron.com, mike.grigsby@enron.com, tim.heizenrader@enron.com
Date:Mon, 25 Jun 2001 09:29:00 -0700 (PDT)

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
? California Budget Resolved
? FERC Ordered Energy Settlements Stall MOU/Plan B

BUDGET
California legislators in the House have once again established a tentative
reserve amount for the state's depleted budget. Both sides are reportedly
uneasy with the $2.74B compromise and sources indicate that the four
Republican votes needed to pass the budget in the Assembly are likely far
more obtainable than the one Republican vote needed in the Senate.
California's current redistricting process may provide Republicans with
future seats that could translate into immediate bargaining power in energy
and budget matters. Adding to the frustration, sources indicate that
consumer activist Harvey Rosenfield plans to pressure State Treasurer
Angelides into battling with legislators for progress on the budget and
revenue bonds.

ENERGY SETTLEMENTS
Today marked opening negotiations for California state energy officials and
the several large energy providers who are charged with price gouging
Californians. Sources close to California State Sen. Burton report that the
results from the15 days of negotiations before the FERC appointed
Administrative Law Judge, Curtis Wagener, will significantly influence the
state's efforts in promoting any Plan B or MOU. Burton indicated that FERC
would need to order between $3 and $4B in generator refunds before the state
would finalize a SoCal bail-out. Of that amount, SoCal would most likely be
infused with $1B, however, without substantial contributions from power
providers that sold into California and currently fall outside FERC's
jurisdiction (i.e. BC Hydro & LA DWP), a $3 to $5B refund would be impossible
to achieve. Regardless of legislators' desires, sources believe that
consistent with the PG&E bankruptcy advisor's view, a multibillion dollar
refund from FERC is unlikely. Sources will continue to monitor and report on
these negotiations.