Enron Mail

From:ken@kdscommunications.com
To:sgovenar@govadv.com, smara@enron.com, paul.kaufman@enron.com,kdenne@enron.com, jeff.dasovich@enron.com
Subject:Dan Walters
Cc:
Bcc:
Date:Tue, 24 Jul 2001 04:51:00 -0700 (PDT)

Dan Walters: Blame game over California's energy crisis will continue for
years



(Published July 24, 2001)

The wrestling match between politicians and Enron Corp. moved into a more
intense arena over the weekend when a state Senate investigating committee
sought contempt penalties because the huge energy company has refused to
turn over internal documents.

Although Houston-based Enron owns no major power plants in California, it
has adopted the toughest stance of all energy companies against the
multiple investigations of why wholesale energy prices spiked so high. And
it has become, in turn, a whipping boy for California politicians.

At one point last spring, state Attorney General Bill Lockyer said he wanted
criminal charges against Enron and its chairman, Kenneth Lay. "I would love
to personally escort Lay to an 8-by-10 cell that he could share with a
tattooed dude who says, 'Hi, my name is Spike, honey,' " Lockyer said. With
less colorful language, Gov. Gray Davis has often castigated Texas-based
companies as price gougers -- even though Texas firms have been fairly minor
suppliers to California.

Some of it is just buzzword politics. Lockyer and Davis know that
Californians dislike anything associated with Texas, and Lay has been one of
President Bush's major political supporters. Enron, meanwhile, cites the
rhetoric as evidence that Lockyer, Davis and legislative investigators are
interested less in finding the truth than in seeking scapegoats. Enron also
filed a lawsuit challenging the legality of the Senate's subpoenas of
trading data.

Most other energy companies have complied with the demands, creating
Sacramento repositories of the data under elaborate confidentiality
agreements worked out with the special Senate committee headed by Sen.
Joseph Dunn, D-Santa Ana. But Enron has refused, and on Saturday, Dunn
submitted a report asking the Senate for "an appropriate coercive
sanction."

Does Enron have something to hide? Or does it sincerely believe that what's
happening in California is political scapegoating? Are the companies' fears
about the confidentiality of the data sought by the Senate justified? Would
data be selectively leaked to show the firms in the worst light? Would data
be used by competitors? Or could the information find its way into the hands
of class-action attorneys?

Dunn, a prominent trial attorney himself, insists that confidentiality will
be protected and that the information being sought is only for legislative
purposes. But Enron and the other companies have some reason to be wary of
turning over confidential information to politicians. Similar information
was leaked -- without penalty -- in last year's investigation of former
state Insurance Commissioner Chuck Quackenbush. And there are indications
that private lawyers are working closely with investigators.

Mike Aguirre, the San Diego attorney seeking a "smoking gun" to prove
collusion among energy companies, supplied Dunn's committee with a few
dissident Duke Energy workers who alleged, in highly publicized hearings,
that the firm had manipulated production at its San Diego plant to create
artificial shortages and drive up spot market power prices. Duke then
refuted the charges by releasing some excerpts from the records of the
Independent System Operator, the controller of California's power grid,
indicating that ISO had ordered the plant operational changes.

Aguirre subsequently asked the governor's office to pressure the ISO -- now
under Davis' direct control -- to release all of the Duke-related documents
that would show, he says, that the firm actually manipulated the situation.
Duke and other companies insist that the ISO-held documents are proprietary.
Aguirre pleaded with one Davis adviser in an e-mail that "we need your help
in properly getting this information out." But Aguirre, in an interview,
said he had not yet obtained cooperation from Davis aides.

The political and legal struggle to affix blame for California's energy woes
will continue for months, perhaps years. The crisis will cost ratepayers at
least $50 billion, and they'll want to know why as they make out their
utility bill checks.



The Bee's Dan Walters can be reached at (916) 321-1195 or dwalters@sacbee.com
.