Enron Mail

From:alan.comnes@enron.com
To:tim.belden@enron.com, christopher.calger@enron.com,tim.heizenrader@enron.com, stephen.swain@enron.com, susan.mara@enron.com, jeff.dasovich@enron.com, james.steffes@enron.com
Subject:FW: DWR contracts on-line
Cc:
Bcc:
Date:Fri, 6 Jul 2001 08:17:00 -0700 (PDT)

It's worth going to this site just to "flip the switch" and see the redacted
portions appear before your very eyes!

-----Original Message-----
From: Thome, Jennifer
Sent: Friday, July 06, 2001 10:31 AM
To: Comnes, Alan; Sharma, Ban
Cc: Steffes, James; Andrews, Jeff; Lassander, Richard; Yajnik, Neha; Johnson,
Tamara
Subject: DWR contracts on-line


Ken Smith just called my attention to the following. See this link for all
formerly censored language from the DWR contracts:

http://www.sco.ca.gov/power_page/contract_info.htm

Also, see the summary link.

Finally, below is an interesting article about the real cost of the contracts.

Connell: Power cost twice Davis' figure July 6, 2001 By JOHN HOWARD
The Orange County Register SACRAMENTO -- The average cost of electricity
purchased under $43 billion of worth of state contracts is actually more than
double the amount reported by Gov. Gray Davis' administration, state
Controller Kathleen Connell said Thursday. Connell said her staff's analysis
put the per-megawatt average at $170, compared with $69 to $79 estimated by
Davis. Connell stopped short of suggesting that the higher cost could drive
another increase in rates, although consumer groups said the higher amount
likely would require some future increase. The controller, who writes the
state's checks, said her figures assume fixed prices for natural gas over the
duration of the contracts, which range from a few months to 20 years. The
administration, noting that nearly half its contracts are pegged to the
fluctuating market price of natural gas, said costs on many of the contracts
would decline over time. Consumer groups were skeptical of the
administration's numbers. "You could cut these numbers in various ways and
make different averages, long-range or short-range contracts, peak power or
nonpeak, and probably either average could be defended mathematically," said
Nettie Hoge of The Utility Reform Network. "We can't tell you whether it's
$69 or $170 - the contracts are very convoluted and complex."