|
|
Enron Mail |
Their responses should be itneresting....
-----Original Message----- From: Guerrero, Gary (Corp) Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2001 12:00 PM To: Thomas, Dan (CGT Dir); Lund, Peter; Tomcala, Karen (Corp) Cc: Anderson, David W (Law); Armato, John P; Cherry, Brian; Lindh, Frank (Law); Petersen, Donald Subject: FERc Questions to SoCal Gas FERC issued a letter order requesting further information to help understand Lad Lorenz's presentation at the May 24 California Gas Infrastructure Conference. A copy of the FERC questions, as well as Lad's presentation is attached. <<PL01-4.00B.doc<< <<LadLorenz.ppt<< Specifically FERC seeks to understand: 1. Since SoCal is a matrix system, why is Topock a more desirable receipt point than Blythe (Ehrenberg) or any other receipt point on the SoCal system? 2. How SoCal determines the amount of capacity that is available at each interstate receipt point. 3. How SoCal determines who gets capacity on the SoCal system or if they rely on El Paso's priority system, and how nominations and confirmations work. 4. The rationale the current procedures in which non-core customers cannot contract for firm capacity on SoCal's backbone system. 5. The process of lining up markets if a "marketer" is nominating capacity on the SoCal system. 6. Curtailments, or lack thereof on the SoCal system. 7. The authority SoCalGas has to construct its proposed 4 smaller expansion projects at a total cost of $55 million which will add 475 MMcfd (13.5%) of firm backbone capacity. 8. Whether SoCal has or has in effect proposed an exit fee for customers that interconnect to new interstate pipeline capacity? 9. Whether SoCal received or requested an "award", increased revenue, a sharing of savings, or similar monetary benefit from Hub services or the operation of the Gold Coast Incentive Mechanism? - PL01-4.00B.doc - LadLorenz.ppt
|