|
|
Enron Mail |
YES
From: Jeff Dasovich on 07/06/2001 11:09 AM Sent by: Jeff Dasovich To: Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, mpalmer@enron.com cc: Subject: Re: Dunn Subpoena you mean communicate the fact that mark views me as wholly expendable? i'm hurt, mark. best, jeff Richard Shapiro 07/05/2001 03:32 PM To: Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron cc: Subject: Dunn Subpoena Please communicate or distribute as you see fit. Thanks. ---------------------- Forwarded by Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron on 07/05/2001 03:32 PM --------------------------- From: Mark Palmer on 07/05/2001 02:28 PM To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron cc: Subject: Dunn Subpoena Fighting the kangaroo court actually got us some points with the media. If we can continue without getting anyone (other than Dasovich) thrown in jail, let's fight. Mark ----- Forwarded by Mark Palmer/Corp/Enron on 07/05/2001 02:27 PM ----- Robert C Williams/ENRON@enronXgate 07/05/2001 02:20 PM To: Mark E Haedicke/Enron@EnronXGate cc: Richard B Sanders/Enron@enronXgate, Mark Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, James Derrick/ENRON@enronXgate Subject: Dunn Subpoena The Dunn Committee will be taking up the contempt citations again on Tuesday, July 10. We are currently contemplating two actions. First, we intend to offer to produce some documents, most notably the ISO bid data sought (which the Committee already has anyway). Secondly, as we do not expect this voluntary partial production to placate the Committee, we are preparing an action to file in federal court in Sacramento on Monday challenging the subpoena to the extent it seeks to require the production of documents other than those we offered to produce. Robin Gibbs and Mike Kirby are on board with this. Please let me know if would like any additional information about these matters. Thank you.
|