Enron Mail

From:susan.mara@enron.com
To:jeff.dasovich@enron.com
Subject:Re: Gouger Gray Davis :
Cc:harry.kingerski@enron.com, james.steffes@enron.com, janel.guerrero@enron.com,jeff.dasovich@enron.com, karen.denne@enron.com, linda.robertson@enron.com, mpalmer@enron.com, paul.kaufman@enron.com, richard.shapiro@enron.com, skean@enron.com, susan.landwe
Bcc:harry.kingerski@enron.com, james.steffes@enron.com, janel.guerrero@enron.com,jeff.dasovich@enron.com, karen.denne@enron.com, linda.robertson@enron.com, mpalmer@enron.com, paul.kaufman@enron.com, richard.shapiro@enron.com, skean@enron.com, susan.landwe
Date:Tue, 31 Jul 2001 03:14:00 -0700 (PDT)

These are the people to whom Western Power Trading Forum is contributing
funds for a paper on the electricity crisis.

Sue Mara
Enron Corp.
Tel: (415) 782-7802
Fax:(415) 782-7854



Jeff Dasovich
Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
07/31/2001 09:33 AM

To: skean@enron.com, Richard Shapiro/Enron@EnronXGate, James D
Steffes/Enron@EnronXGate, Karen Denne/Enron@EnronXGate, mpalmer@enron.com,
Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Paul Kaufman/Enron@EnronXGate, Harry
Kingerski/Enron@EnronXGate, Linda Robertson/NA/Enron@ENRON, Susan M
Landwehr/Enron@EnronXGate, Janel Guerrero/Enron@EnronXGate
cc:
Subject: Gouger Gray Davis :
California's petulant governor ignores reality as he overpays for electricity

Gouger Gray Davis
California's petulant governor ignores reality as he overpays for electricity

LANCE T. IZUMI Mr. Izumi is a senior fellow in California Studies at the San
Francisco- based Pacific Research Institute.
On the surface, things seem to be going pretty good for Gov. Gray Davis with
regard to California's electricity crisis. The governor has scored some nice
publicity by switching on some new power plants. The weather has been
unseasonably cool. His poll numbers are edging back up. Yet beneath this
optimistic picture lie troubling problems. For example, Davis's argument that
out-of-state power generators are responsible for the electricity crisis has
been falling apart. For months, Davis has been claiming that private
generators have overcharged California by $8.9 billion and demanded that this
amount be refunded to the state. However, after a two-week mediation between
state officials and the generators, Curtis Wagner, the federal government's
chief energy regulatory judge, rebuked Davis's claim saying that such a huge
overcharge "has not and cannot be substantiated." Further, while the
generators may be liable to refund a much smaller amount to the state,
perhaps $1 billion, Wagner said that generators are owed more money by the
state than they owe the state in refunds: "Can a cash refund be required
where a much larger amount is due the seller? The chief judge thinks not."
Davis reacted to the judge's ruling by calling it a "raw deal" and by urging
the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission to ignore the lack of evidence and
the judge's conclusions and to "step up and provide the refunds we've asked
for." Davis's position, as usual, is motivated purely by politics. Indeed,
Dan Walters of the Sacramento Bee says that Davis is operating in a
"melodramatic virtual world" de-linked from reality.
Davis's blame-the-generators argument took another body blow when newly
released documents showed that, on average, major out-of-state power
companies such as Enron, Duke, Dynergy and Mirant charged less than the
average prices paid by the state during the first three months of the year.
California government utilities, on the other hand, such as the Los Angeles
Department of Water and Power and the Sacramento Municipal Utility District
(SMUD), charged the state much more for electricity than the out-of-state
generators. For example, while Texas-based Enron, a favorite Davis whipping
boy, charged an average $181 per megawatt hour, SMUD charged an average $330
per megawatt hour.
Davis responded to this revelation in typical political fashion. A Davis
spokesman said that the governor had expressed his anger at "the generators
who wear cowboy hats" and that "just because there are other entities that
are charging us more doesn't change the fact that we are getting ripped off
by companies from Houston, Tulsa, Atlanta or Charlotte."
Yet, for all Davis' feigned indignation about consumers being ripped off, it
turns out that he and his regulators are poised to ensure that business
consumers are ripped off by state government. Davis has signed $43 billion in
ill-advised long-term purchase contracts at rates above-market-price. The
state must, therefore, ensure that enough business customers remain in the
current state-controlled distribution system to pay for high-priced state
power purchases. This is especially important to Davis since the high prices
are borne disproportionately by business. Thus, Davis' regulators are set to
eliminate "direct access," which allows businesses to shop for cheaper power.
Who's the real gouger? No matter how much Davis points the finger,
Californians are paying dearly for his political opportunism and bad
policies.