You are the greatest!
I will check with my people and make sure that date works, and confirm with
you by COB tomorrow.
I am relieved to hear you are still alive, by the way.



From: Jeff Dasovich on 01/23/2001 04:23 PM
Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
To: Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron
cc:

Subject: Re: Response to ORA/TURN petition

the 14th and the 14th (seriously, sorry---that work)!



Susan Scott
01/23/2001 04:20 PM

To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: Re: Response to ORA/TURN petition

Pick a first and second choice: Feb. 8, 14 or 15.



From: Jeff Dasovich on 01/23/2001 03:56 PM
Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
To: Leslie Lawner/NA/Enron@Enron, Jeffery Fawcett/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Susan
Scott/ET&S/Enron
cc:

Subject: Re: Response to ORA/TURN petition

Leslie: Jeff and Susan might be able to help with the pipeline charges.
Susan: I'm not ignoring you. Of course I'll come. Give me a call and let's
figure out a date for me to address your illustrious group. Jeff: How's
married life treating you. Leslie: Sorry for all the extraneous babbling.

Best,
Jeff



Leslie Lawner
01/23/2001 03:20 PM

To: mday@gmssr.com
cc: Phillip K Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Harry
Kingerski/NA/Enron@Enron, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Rebecca W
Cantrell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Frank Ermis/HOU/ECT@ECT,
James Shirley/HOU/EES@EES, Roger O Ponce/HOU/EES@EES, Don Black/HOU/EES@EES,
Robert Neustaedter/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
Subject: Response to ORA/TURN petition

Mike - Here is the situation. Between ENA and EES, we sell gas to core and
non-core customers, and also have gas in storage as well as in the park and
lend service. I think we can be sympathetic to the ORA argument that the
diversion tariff penalties did not anticipate OFOs and EFOs in situations
such as we face here (shortages due to credit problems rather than lack of
supply). Assessing extreme penalties, as the OFO/EFOs would do, on users who
are not perfectly imbalance under this situation certainly seems unfair.
However, I think we should argue that limiting the payments to
shippers/customers whose gas is diverted to serve core customers to a market
index may not fully compensate for the diversion. The pay back specifically
does not include interstate pipeline charges, and there may be other costs as
well to the marketer/customer who had supplies taken away.

I need an estimate of the cost to make this filing and follow it up for the
RCR process, and I would also like any feedback anyone has on what our
position should be in this matter. The response is due Friday.