![]() |
Enron Mail |
Here, Here.
In my opinion, end game here is a CYA for SoCal to at least "appear" to be concerned, and a means to collectively gang-up on the CPUC to give the LDC's cost recovery mechanisms for any needed investments. -----Original Message----- From: Dasovich, Jeff Sent: Wednesday, February 28, 2001 4:20 PM To: Fossum, Drew Cc: Fawcett, Jeffery; Scott, Susan Subject: Re: FW: SoCalGas Capacity Forum Lad can play both roles pretty effectively. Drew Fossum 02/28/2001 01:57 PM To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron cc: Jeffery Fawcett/Enron@EnronXGate, Susan Scott/enron@enronXgate Subject: Re: FW: SoCalGas Capacity Forum << OLE Object: StdOleLink << Thanks. My guess is that someone ought to go and represent TW. Fawcett and Harris ought to make that call. Jeff D: I assume you know who Lad Lorenz is. Either Jeff: does Lad's involvement signal anything to us--i.e., is he their "get stuff done guy" or their "try to look like you are getting stuff done guy" ? DF From: Jeff Dasovich on 02/27/2001 07:51 PM Sent by: Jeff Dasovich To: Jeffery Fawcett/Enron@EnronXGate, Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron, Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON cc: Subject: FW: SoCalGas Capacity Forum You get this? Someone that I know forwarded it along to me. Know anything about it? Best, Jeff - Capacity Forum.doc << File: Capacity Forum.doc <<
|