|
|
Enron Mail |
FYI. Will try and keep everyone informed.
Jim ----- Forwarded by James D Steffes/NA/Enron on 03/04/2001 07:50 PM ----- Mike D Smith@EES 03/02/2001 05:08 PM To: Dan Leff/HOU/EES@EES, Marty Sunde/HOU/EES@EES, Don Black/HOU/EES@EES, Wanda Curry/HOU/EES@EES, Evan Hughes/HOU/EES@EES, Dennis Benevides/HOU/EES@EES, Peggy Mahoney/HOU/EES@EES, Harry Kingerski/NA/Enron@Enron, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Mark Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mark Koenig/Corp/Enron@ENRON cc: Vicki Sharp/HOU/EES@EES, Robert C Williams/Enron@EnronXGate Subject: UC-CSU Call Here is a brief summary of today's call with UC-CSU: Attended by business and legal representatives from each side (including University outside counsel) to discuss views of the dispute Universities are entrenched in their position that we did not have the right to D-DASR their accounts; their demeanor was relatively aggressive They have asked us to explain in more detail our reason for D-DASRing their accounts, including how that action "enhances our ability to fulfill the cost guarantee" under the agreement They demanded again that we return their accounts to our service, and we refused again We reiterated our position that we have the right under the contract to D-DASR and that continued performance of physical delivery was and continues to be commercially impracticable. We pointed out that their actions are impeding our exercise of our rights under the agreement. They expressed an unwillingness to continue the dialogue around a commercial solution until we return their accounts to our service. We agreed to have another telephone conference Monday, but we do not expect much progress. Although not threatened, it remains likely that the universities are considering seeking some sort of injunctive relief Please let me know if you have any questions. MDS
|