Enron Mail

From:jeff.dasovich@enron.com
To:michael.tribolet@enron.com
Subject:RE: Trying agin
Cc:
Bcc:
Date:Fri, 11 May 2001 10:54:00 -0700 (PDT)

agreed.



Michael Tribolet/ENRON@enronXgate
05/11/2001 05:33 PM

To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Jeffrey A Soo/ENRON@enronXgate, Robert
Neustaedter/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
Subject: RE: Trying agin


Note that SCE does not list the information in their SEC disclosures but
Robert had some 1999 figures. Comparing PGE at the sales level, they were
at 79.2 mln MWH in 1999 versus 78.2 for SCE in 1999. This leads me to
believe the 93 mln for PGE and 83 million for SCE in the MOU slide is flat
wrong on the PGE figure. We will need to resolve this.


PGE

SALES MWH 1999

RESIDENTIAL 27,739

COMMERCIAL 30,426
INDUSTRIAL 16,722
ARGICULTURAL 3,739
PUBLIC STREET 437
OTHER UTILITIES 167
OTHER -
NON RESIDENTIAL 51,491

TOTAL 79,230



SCE

SALES MWH 1999

RESIDENTIAL 24,351

COMMERCIAL 28,964
INDUSTRIAL 24,164
ARGICULTURAL
PUBLIC STREET
OTHER UTILITIES
OTHER 727
NON RESIDENTIAL 53,855

TOTAL 78,206


-----Original Message-----
From: Dasovich, Jeff
Sent: Friday, May 11, 2001 5:03 PM
To: Tribolet, Michael
Cc: Soo, Jeffrey A.; Neustaedter, Robert
Subject: RE: Trying agin

can we use the MOU total load numbes (e.g., 93 GWH for PG&E) and divide it up
using the proportions in the PG&E numbers?