|
|
Enron Mail |
Thanks. Let me try to rally the troops. Get them to submit something and
then maybe you and I can simply sign on. Your humble servant, Jeff Jeffery Fawcett/ENRON@enronxgate 03/20/2001 05:13 PM To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron cc: Subject: FYI Dude, Not seeing (either of) the comments directly, its hard to say what our position should be -- Mr. Dasovich, I'll leave that up to your good judgment. However, it would appear that TURN is looking to roll back the clock on any progress we might have made in the GIR process to separate utility services and make them independently available to the marketplace. On that basis, I'd say you've got a reasonable argument to make. As far as Transwestern is concerned, I'd say that, as a general matter, we oppose any change in regulations that would attempt to repackage or rebundle utility services that gives the effect of reducing customer choice. On the other hand, given the backdrop of a frustrated effort in the GIR proceeding, as long as they're leaving Hector Road alone, its hard for me to get too fired up about anything in California these days. Let us know if there is anything you'd like us to do here. Ours is but to serve, my liege. Jeff -----Original Message----- From: Dasovich, Jeff Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2001 4:22 PM To: Fawcett, Jeffery; Scott, Susan Subject: FYI Greetings Mr. Newlywed and Ms Bride-to-be! (Shewt, I'm gettin' all choked up.) I think I'll need to protest TURN's proposal. You folks aware of this? Care? Best, Jeff ----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 03/20/2001 04:20 PM ----- "Daniel Douglass" <Douglass@ArterHadden.com< 03/20/2001 03:37 PM To: <Barbara_Klemstine@apsc.com<, <Vicki_Sandler@apses.com<, <berry@apx.com<, <dcazalet@apx.com<, <billr@calpine.com<, <jackp@calpine.com<, <Ken_Czarnecki@calpx.com<, <gavaughn@duke-energy.com<, <rjhickok@duke-energy.com<, <gtbl@dynegy.com<, <jmpa@dynegy.com<, <jdasovic@enron.com<, <susan_j_mara@enron.com<, <Tamara_Johnson@enron.com<, <curt.Hatton@gen.pge.com<, <foothill@lmi.net<, <camiessn@newwestenergy.com<, <jcgardin@newwestenergy.com<, <jsmollon@newwestenergy.com<, <rsnichol@newwestenergy.com<, <nam.nguyen@powersrc.com<, <Curtis_L_Kebler@reliantenergy.com< cc: Subject: FYI On 2/14, the Southern California Generator Coalition filed a petmod asking that the Commission amend winter balancing rules to allow customers to bring more gas into the system than the 10% imbalance rules permit and that customers be allowed to use the previous month's accumulated positive imbalance in lieu of flowing supplies. The generator members of WPTF with facilities in southern California may be interested in knowing that TURN's 3/15 comments recommend instead that the Commission should rebundle the costs of storage for electric generators in their transportation rates and requires SoCalGas to store gas on behalf of those customers. Let me know if you want to see the TURN comments. Dan
|