|
|
Enron Mail |
Marty: Thanks for the information.
Getting Eric's contact information to Alpert's office is in motion. Regarding attempt to follow-up with those who called Alpert's office to complain, I wasn't clear on that action. Likely makes sense for Eric to coordinate with Sandi to make the contact with Alpert's office. Letters are an attempt to influence Alpert to 1) fix the Direct Access prohibition and 2) ensure that DA customers don't get saddled with the DWR costs. Let me know if this approach works. Best, Jeff Marty Sunde@EES 03/19/2001 07:02 PM To: Jeff Dasovich/Na/Enron@ENRON cc: Eric Letke/DUB/EES@EES, Heidi Messick/EFS/EES@EES, Sandra McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron Subject: Re: Follow up with Alpert's Office All I asked Eric to do was: ensure that there was an Enron contact if another complaint came in. find out from Alpert's office if we could call back a few of those who called to complain to find out what they perceived, correct the misperception, apologize. From: Jeff Dasovich@ENRON on 03/19/2001 04:20 PM Sent by: Jeff Dasovich@ENRON To: Scott Govenar <sgovenar@govadv.com<, Eric Letke/DUB/EES@EES, Sandra McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron, hgovenar@govadv.com, Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, mpalmer@enron.com, Karen Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Janel Guerrero/Corp/Enron@Enron, Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Harry Kingerski/NA/Enron@Enron, MDay@GMSSR.com, ken@kdscommunications.com, Marty Sunde/HOU/EES@EES cc: Subject: Follow up with Alpert's Office Thanks, Scott. Scott/Hedy/Sandi/Bev: Erik Letke heads up the retail marketing effort underway in San Diego. Marty Sunde wants Alpert to have an EES commercial contact that she can talk to in the event she has further questions, etc., He'd like Erki to be the contact person. Erik could you copy your vitals (title, contact info) to Scott and Hedy Govenar and Sandi McCubbin so they can forward along to Alpert? Erik, seems that it would be useful if the customer letters to Alpert could make the following points (folks please weigh in and add/subtract/modify if needed): The customer's glad to have had the option to take Direct Access service from Enron because having the opportunity to take advantage of the offer has made the customer better off. Direct Access is an extremely important option that customers need, want and should have going forward. Any "solution" that the Legislature comes up with must therefore include the continuation of Direct Access for all customers. As such, the Legislature should immediately fix AB 1X to make sure that Direct Access remains a permanent fixture of California's energy strategy. Direct Access customers should not be forced to pay for DWR's power purchase costs, since Direct Access customers aren't benefitting from those purchases. Best, Jeff Scott Govenar <sgovenar@govadv.com< 03/19/2001 04:01 PM To: Jeff Dasovich <jdasovic@enron.com< cc: Subject: Dede As discussed, customers should send letters to Dede as follows: The Honrable Dede Alpert California State Senate State Capitol, Room 5050 Sacramento, CA 95814 Interested companies should copy: "Honorable Members of the California State Legislature" and fax or mail me a copy for further distribution. My fax is (916) 448-0816 and my address is 1127 11th Street, Suite #400, Sacramento, CA 95814. Scott
|