|
|
Enron Mail |
FYI.
-----Original Message----- From: Dan Douglass [mailto:douglass@energyattorney.com] Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 10:36 PM To: Vicki Sandler; Tamara Johnson; Mara, Susan; Steve Huhman; Roger Pelote;= Rob Nichol; Randy Hickok; Nam Nguyen; Jim Crossen; Dasovich, Jeff; Janie M= ollon; Jack Pigott; Greg Blue; George Vaughn; Gary Ackerman; Ed Cazalet; De= nice Cazalet Purdum; Curtis Kebler; Curt Hatton; Corby Gardiner; Charles Mi= essner; Carolyn Baker; Bill Ross; Karen Shea; Max Bulk; ARM Subject: CLECA/CIU/SVMG CLECA, CIU and the Silicon Valley Manufacturing Group have also come out wi= th all guns blazing against the draft decision dealing with the DWR revenue= requirement. They decry the lack of hearings, state that there are fundam= ental untruths in the decision and conclude that, "The DWR has made it clea= r that it needs to have a decision on its revenue requirements quickly so t= hat it can successfully issue bonds to generate revenue to re-pay the gener= al fund. No one has been permitted to test that proposition, but it seems = to be accepted as fact by decision makers. The problem is that this record= does not support approval of any particular revenue requirement for DWR an= d it certainly does not support the allocation proposed in the DD. If the = Commission must act quickly, then it must act provisionally and set for fur= ther hearings the many questions identified here and, we suspect, in the co= mments of many other interested parties concerning the basis of the allocat= ion among the utilities." =20 Dan =20 Law Offices of Daniel W. Douglass 5959 Topanga Canyon Blvd. Suite 244 Woodland Hills, CA 91367 Tel: (818) 596-2201 Fax: (818) 346-6502 douglass@energyattorney.com <mailto:douglass@energyattorney.com<
|