Enron Mail

From:jeff.dasovich@enron.com
To:tim.belden@enron.com
Subject:FW: POWER Working Paper Email Notification Service (PWPENS)
Cc:
Bcc:
Date:Mon, 1 Oct 2001 13:17:38 -0700 (PDT)

FYI.

-----Original Message-----
From: PWPENS [mailto:pwpens@socrates.Berkeley.EDU]
Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 1:11 PM
To: (Recipient list suppressed)
Subject: POWER Working Paper Email Notification Service (PWPENS)


_________________________________________________________________

N E W P O W E R W O R K I N G P A P E R

Working Paper Series of UCEI
_________________________________________________________________


POWER Working Paper Email Notification Service (PWPENS)
A service of The University of California Energy Institute's Program on
Workable Energy Regulation (POWER). All POWER working papers can be
downloaded free of charge from the UCEI website: http://www.ucei.org Just
follow the link to "POWER Research".
________________________________________
"Trading Inefficiencies in California's Electricity Markets" (October 2001)
PWP-086 by Severin Borenstein, James Bushnell, Christopher R.
Knittel, and Catherine Wolfram


We study price convergence between the two major markets for
wholesale electricity in California from their deregulation in April 1998
through November 2000, nearly the end of trading in one market. We would
expect profit-maximizing traders to have eliminated persistent price
differences between the markets. Institutional impediments and traders'
incomplete understanding of the markets, however, could have delayed or
prevented price convergence. We find that the two benchmark electricity
prices in California - the Power Exchange's day-ahead price and the
Independent System Operator's real-time price - differed substantially
after the markets opened but then appeared to be converging by the
beginning of 2000. Starting in May 2000, however, price levels and price
differences increased dramatically. We consider several explanations for
the significant price differences and conclude that rapidly changing market
rules and market fundamentals, including one buyer's attempt to exercise a
form of monopoly power, made it difficult for traders to take advantage of
opportunities that ex post appear to have been profitable.



Download this paper in Adobe Acrobat format: http://www.ucei.org/PDF/pwp086.pdf
________________________________________


If you would like to be removed from this list, please send an email to
Mailto:pwpens@socrates.berkeley.edu and include UNSUBSCRIBE in the subject
heading. If you received this email indirectly and would like to be added
to this emailing list, please send an email to
Mailto:pwpens@socrates.berkeley.edu and include SUBSCRIBE in the subject
heading.