|
|
Enron Mail |
Mike, if you Janet or Dave can cut the deal with Izzo go ahead and speak to
him. I don't think there is any practical way to enforce any percieved call we have on Izzo so you will have to determine how much Larry really wants the trubine or how he could benefit from striking a different deal. Regards Delainey ---------------------- Forwarded by David W Delainey/HOU/ECT on 07/25/2000 08:06 PM --------------------------- Mike J Miller 07/25/2000 06:09 PM To: David W Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: W David Duran/HOU/ECT@ECT, Douglas Clifford/Corp/Enron@ENRON Subject: Goldendale Turbine Dave, In going through the turbine list over the last few days, EE&CC's, Sumas II- Goldendale (GE 7FA, Jun '01 delivery) turbine keeps popping up. ENA could trade this turbine to several parties (Tenaska, Indeck) to get a lock on a QF restructuring. Also, Sumas I still has restructruring value that EE&CC did not get a lock on in exchange for the EPC/turbine contract. As I recall, Larry Izzo promised to replace the GE 7FA turbine with a comparable machine with a Q4-2001 delivery date. While the Goldendale EPC contract may executed and there may be nothing to do, there is significant value sitting on the table. If we cannot get the Goldendale 7FA back, then can we enforce the replacement provision that was promised (as I remember) as part of your original deal with Larry Izzo? I realize that at this point the politics may prevent us from doing anything. However, I at least want to get you thinking about it just in case there was a way to get a turbine to trade for larger value than an EPC contract for EE&CC. Regards, Mike J. Miller
|