|
|
Enron Mail |
How could coal fired QF's play into your and George's strategy?
Regards Delainey ---------------------- Forwarded by David W Delainey/HOU/ECT on 07/13/2000 08:31 PM --------------------------- David W Delainey 07/12/2000 12:02 AM To: Michael J Beyer/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: George McClellan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Daniel Reck/HOU/ECT@ECT, Christopher F Calger/PDX/ECT@ECT, Janet R Dietrich/HOU/ECT@ECT Subject: Coal Fired Generation Mike, this looks great - looking forward to seeing your final thoughts. Regards Delainey ---------------------- Forwarded by David W Delainey/HOU/ECT on 07/11/2000 11:56 PM --------------------------- From: Michael J Beyer 07/11/2000 06:04 PM To: David W Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: George McClellan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Daniel Reck/HOU/ECT@ECT Subject: Coal Fired Generation Dave In response to your e mail, this is meant to update you on the status of the search for potential coal fired generation sites. We have used the following criteria to screen potential sites east of the Mississippi including the following: Underutilized existing coal fired generation (15 sites) Existing coal fired generation that is on cold stand by (12 sites) Coal units that have been retired (20 sites) Coal fired units that at one time had planned coal unit additions that were delayed or cancelled (11 sites) Undeveloped sites that had planned to build coal units (13 sites) Undeveloped sites that had planned to build nuclear units (5 sites) We are in the process of prioritizing each site based on infrastructure, transmission access, market and permit status. That effort should be concluded this week and the study forwarded to you. We are also talking with two coal operators that are in the process of developing their own coal fired generation in Kentucky and West Virginia. We will keep you apprised of the progress and meet with you again as we move to the next stage.
|