Enron Mail

From:kate.cole@enron.com
To:james.derrick@enron.com
Subject:Owenreagh Power Partners Limited
Cc:
Bcc:
Date:Tue, 27 Nov 2001 08:35:46 -0800 (PST)

Jim - An update on the Owenreagh Power Partners letter that you received and forwarded to me for handling. It appears from the below emails that it is a problem getting an auditor to prepare the accounts. However I was informed that the file date has been extended to 12/31. The following message re the file date is from Debbie Pritt:

"FYI - I just spoke with Janet of Companies House and verified with her that the Form 233 I submitted is to extend the 2001 filing date from 10/31 to 12/31. She indicated that this 14 month filing period will be approved and that all subsequent filings will be for the period ended 12/31."

I'll keep you informed as I hear more info.

KC



Kate B. Cole
Director, Corporate Services
Enron Corp.
Tel: (713) 853-1624
Fax: (713) 646-8007
Email: kate.cole@enron.com


-----Original Message-----
From: Pritt, Deborah
Sent: 27 November, 2001 9:46 AM
To: Kelly, Sue; Wood, Christopher; Buckley, Cindy; Cole, Kate
Cc: Gunther, Dave; Aird, Gordon; Newell, Eric; Badger, Dan; Westbeld,
Mike
Subject: FW: Enron


Well, Gordon and I are certainly stunned! D&T has refused to do the audit. Gordon knows a UK Chartered Accountant located here in Houston so he is trying to contact him. We are exploring any options at this time.

Debbie

Debbie Pritt
Senior Accounting Specialist
Enron Wind
Phone: (713) 345-6509
Fax: (713) 646-7197


-----Original Message-----
From: Sharma, Sanjay (UK - London) [mailto:sasharma@deloitte.co.uk]
Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2001 9:08 AM
To: Pritt, Deborah; Aird, Gordon
Cc: Hamilton, Ian (UK - London); Cheshire, Joe (UK - London)
Subject: FW: Enron




< -----Original Message-----
< From: Turner, Mike (UK - London)
< Sent: 27 November 2001 14:54
< To: Sharma, Sanjay (UK - London)
< Subject: Enron
<
< Dear Debbie
<
< Further to receiving all the documentation relating to Owenreagh last
< week, we have looked at the work we would need to perform surrounding all
< of the entities that surround the current structure of the UK company and
< are concerned that this would prove to be an expensive way to conduct the
< work. For example we have no knowledge of the Cayman Island company or
< the Windfarm project itself as we are not auditors.
<
< Additionally, the current pressure on the Enron shareprice and possible
< acquisition by Dynergy suggests that your current auditors Andersons
< should be performing the work as they may be expected to have more
< knowledge of the group than us. This does not impact upon the current tax
< restructuring advise being given.
<
< Regards
<
< Sanjay