|
|
Enron Mail |
-----Original Message----- From: Astramowicz, Jarek Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 10:47 AM To: Overfield, Adam; Cattigan, Ed; Forycki, Krzysztof; Edgley, Anne; Wantschek, Lloyd; Derrick Jr., James Subject: RE: Resolution No 9 The package is significantly higher than what the industry peers would receive in this position and in this market. I wish we had a chance to discuss this issue internally first. In case I were to retain him as part of Enron Poland at a later date - I can not justify this level of remuneration as part of my budget. Jarek -----Original Message----- From: Overfield, Adam Sent: 15 November 2001 17:41 To: Astramowicz, Jarek; Cattigan, Ed; Forycki, Krzysztof; Edgley, Anne; Wantschek, Lloyd; Derrick Jr., James Subject: RE: Resolution No 9 Jarek I have discussed this with Jacek. The reason for increasing Jacek's package is retention. Adam -----Original Message----- From: Astramowicz, Jarek Sent: 15 November 2001 16:24 To: Cattigan, Ed; Overfield, Adam; Forycki, Krzysztof; Edgley, Anne; Wantschek, Lloyd; Derrick Jr., James Subject: RE: Resolution No 9 Has this package been discussed with Jacek yet at all ? -----Original Message----- From: Cattigan, Ed Sent: 15 November 2001 16:56 To: Overfield, Adam; Astramowicz, Jarek; Forycki, Krzysztof; Edgley, Anne; Wantschek, Lloyd; Derrick Jr., James Subject: Resolution No 9 Hi Attached is resolution 9 filled in with Jacek's remuneration for you perusal prior to the Board meeting. regards Ed << File: RESOLUTION NO 9.doc <<
|