|
|
Enron Mail |
I will support your and Chris's decision. Jim
-----Original Message----- From: Harris, Stephanie J Sent: Monday, October 29, 2001 10:14 AM To: Derrick Jr., James Subject: FW: Dabhol Power Project - GOI Guarantee Arbitration -----Original Message----- From: Bruce.Lundstrom@enron.com@ENRON Sent: Monday, October 29, 2001 8:57 AM To: Harris, Stephanie J Cc: Rob.Walls.enronXgate@enron.com Subject: FW: Dabhol Power Project - GOI Guarantee Arbitration Jim - I'm attaching an e-mail from Chris Walker and a letter from Arthur Marriott. Arthur has been invited by the 2 existing arbitrators to act as the third arbitrator in the existing GOI Guarantee arbitration. Christopher supports Arthur's participation. However, Arthur and his firm have some Enron involvement. First, he represents Shell on the Cuiba project. Second, some of Arthur's partners (and not Arthur) have been advising some of the Indian lenders on aspects of NY law. Neither of these representations particularly bother Christopher but he wants to make sure that it does not bother Enron. Can you let me know today if you believe that these issues present a problem for Arthur acting as the 3rd arbitrator? Thanks, Bruce ---------------------- Forwarded by Bruce Lundstrom/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on 10/29/2001 08:51 AM --------------------------- "Walker, Christopher" <christopher.walker@linklaters.com< on 10/29/2001 08:39:51 AM To: "'Bruce.Lundstrom@enron.com'" <Bruce.Lundstrom@enron.com< cc: Subject: FW: Dabhol Power Project - GOI Guarantee Arbitration Bruce, In order to stand this one up for 9th November 2001, I am going to need to go back to Arthur Marriott QC tommorrow. Can you let me know whether you foresee any difficulty with the potential conflicts to which he refers. < -----Original Message----- < From: Walker, Christopher < Sent: 26 October 2001 16:21 < To: 'Bruce.Lundstrom@enron.com' < Cc: 'Paul.Kraske@enron.com'; 'Gail.Brownfeld@enron.com'; < 'jw1000mac@yahoo.com'; Walker, Christopher; Reid, Greg; Quinn, Kelly < Michael < Subject: Dabhol Power Project - GOI Guarantee Arbitration < < Bruce, < < Arthur Marriott QC has written to the parties to clear conflicts. < < I know nothing about his third point. His fourth point is < self-explanatory. < < The fourth point is not one which I would find troubling. I would trust < him to keep the issues in the arbitration confidential,and the arbitral < appointment is essentially personal to him. However,all of that may be < seen differently from a US perspective. < < I would like to go back to him as promptly as is feasible. < < < < < <<From Arthur Marriott.tif<< < < _____________________________________________________________ This e-mail is sent by or on behalf of Linklaters, 10/F Alexandra House, Chater Road, Hong Kong. A list of the firm's principals will be provided to the recipient(s) of this email upon request. This statement is made in compliance with the Law Society of Hong Kong's Practice Direction on the Format of Electronic Communications. This message is confidential. It may also be privileged or otherwise protected by work product immunity or other legal rules. If you have received it by mistake please let us know by reply and then delete it from your system; you should not copy the message or disclose its contents to anyone. _____________________________________________________________ (See attached file: From Arthur Marriott.tif) - From Arthur Marriott.tif << File: From Arthur Marriott.tif <<
|