|
|
Enron Mail |
Daniel,
I do remember working on an assignment agreement regarding the assignment of the Columbia Energy contracts with MSCGI to Enron North America Corp. I will need to find the document. It is my understanding that, with the exception of one deal, all the deals between ENA and MSCGI are firm deals of greater than one month duration. ENA uses the GISB for month or less firm deals and interruptible deals of any length as recommended by the Gas Industry Standards Board. For firm deals that are longer than one month, ENA uses a master firm agreement if one exists. If there is no master firm agreement, we send out our General Terms and Conditions with our confirmation. That answers your question of why Ellen sent our GTC when there is a GISB in place. It appears to me that you and I need to work on getting a master firm agreement in place. Please let me know your thoughts. Stacy Daniel Garcia <Daniel.Garcia@msdw.com< 03/13/2001 01:54 PM Please respond to Daniel.Garcia To: stacy.e.dickson@enron.com cc: "Hansen, Marie" <Marie.Hansen@msdw.com<, "Hart, Deborah" <Deborah.Hart@msdw.com< Subject: Enron GISB Stacy, The pieces of the puzzle are starting to fall into place.? Thank you for the fax of the Columbia Energy GISB. Please note that we have a Transfer and Termination Agreement (dated January 1, 2000), whereby certain Columbia Energy financial and purchase & sale agreements were terminated by Enron North America Corp.? The Columbia Energy GISB was not referenced in the Transfer and Termination Agreement, so I'm assuming the GISB survived the termination process. Did our two companies enter into an assignment & novation agreement, or other similar document, specific to the Columbia Energy GISB? Also, please let me know what conclusion you and Ellen have reached in regard to the long-form/GTC issue.? I thank you for your help. Kind Regards, Dan 212-761-8660
|