FEB2000 Intercompany Accrual variances

Below is a list of Sitara deals that had volume variances or where one side
(purchase/sale) did not get accrued for the FEB 2000 accrual. My goal
here is to bring this to everyone attention and second to see if there is a
solution. I am taking a simplistic approach here in that since
Intercompany Sitara deals are the same that the nominations on both sides
should match on the month end accruals. If I am wrong on this assumption
or if there is a system limitation I am free to suggestions, ideas or
resolutions. Please feel free to give me a call.

HPLC selling to ENA. Production month FEB00(accrual):
Volume variance:
Sitara: Meter/Point Volume Amount
156071 HPL/0980391 vol var of 24,167mmbtu <$60,538.34<
MIDT/0988743

Missing on Purchase side (ENA)
Sitara: Meter/Point Volume Amount
160579 HPL/0986363 632,272mmbtu $1,599,402.29
161541 HPL/0980694 108,576mmbtu $278,296.18
166459 HGPL/8177-4570 30,000mmbtu $75,000.00
201810 HPL/0986363 50,000mmbtu $129,500.00
201839 HPL/0980694 20,000mmbtu $51,800.00
202672 LONE/0361770 23,417mmbtu $58,274.16
280083 HPL/0980308 555,292mmbtu $1,518,225.09
Total 1,395,689mmbtu $3,710,497.72
****************************************

MISSION: Proactively Identify and resolve Intercompany volume issues
upstream.

First Goal: Tying Intercompany volumes on the monthly accruals.
Second Goal: Tying Intercompany volumes on actuals.
Third Goal: Minimizing analyse time saving $$$$.

Thanks
Gregg Lenart
Texas Gas Settlements
3-6921