|
|
Enron Mail |
FYI - We agree with the 17.500
"Eileen Ponton" <kponton@duke-energy.com< on 03/08/2001 11:51:38 AM To: Melissa Jones/Texas Utilities@TU cc: Subject: Re: NOMS / ACTUAL FLOW FOR 03/07/01 Have spoken w/ both gas controls (HPL/DEFS) and will agree with your 17,500. "Melissa Jones" To: "Eileen Ponton" <kponton@duke-energy.com< <mjones7@txu. cc: "David Avila" <davila1@txu.com<, "Charlie Stone" com< <cstone1@txu.com< bcc: 03/08/01 Subject: Re: NOMS / ACTUAL FLOW FOR 03/07/01 09:27 AM We disagree. We show 17.500, that was 0200 to 0900 @ 60 rate which equals 17.500 "Eileen Ponton" <kponton@duke-energy.com< on 03/08/2001 10:56:39 AM To: David Avila/LSP/ENSERCH/US@TU, Charlie Stone/Texas Utilities@TU, Melissa Jones/Texas Utilities@TU, HPL.SCHEDULING@ENRON.COM, LIZ.BELLAMY@ENRON.COM cc: Subject: NOMS / ACTUAL FLOW FOR 03/07/01 Per my gas control, Tufco went to 60,000 at midnight and reduced to 45,000 at 3:00 am due to PG&E having a compressor down. Nom rate calculated on 3 hrs at 60,000 and 6 hrs at 45,000. Please let me know if you have heard differently. DATE NOM FLOW - MCF FLOW - MMBTU 3/07 18,750 14,140 14,522 BTU = 1.027
|