|
|
Enron Mail |
DAAAH!
Sorry! Daren J Farmer 10/16/2000 05:57 PM To: Sandi M Braband/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Subject: Re: Rate for Tenaska Deal Consumer Price Index From: Sandi M Braband on 10/16/2000 12:14 PM To: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Subject: Re: Rate for Tenaska Deal Daren, Thanks--while I'm certain I should know, I must confess that i do not know what CPI stands for??? Sandi Daren J Farmer 10/16/2000 11:39 AM To: Sandi M Braband/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bob M Hall/NA/Enron@Enron cc: Subject: Re: Rate for Tenaska Deal Sandi, Sorry for just now getting back with you. I was out last week. The rate ($.04/mmbtu) will be charged on the greater of the volumes nominated on the supply contracts or the actual deliveries to the plant. The fee will be adjusted yearly based on CPI. Bob - I could not remember if we stated the type of settlement on the delivered volumes (actuals or nominations). I think we should use actuals due to possibility that the plant could over pull with out our knowledge on a daily basis. We would receive the estimates/actuals on a lag and may have to purchase gas to offset the imbalance, even though the plant kept the noms at the 45,000 base. I also think that if the plant does increase the nom, they are more likely to pull the additional volume rather than pulling less. Do you agree with this? D From: Sandi M Braband on 10/10/2000 03:41 PM To: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Subject: Rate for Tenaska Deal Daren, When we met regarding the rate for the Tenaska Gas Management Agreement, you guys mentioned that it would be tied to an index--could you restate for me how that is to work--it will start out 4 cents per MMBTU based on the greater of the volumes nominated through the supply contracts or the actual deliveries to the plant. Then the fee will vary month to month? year to year? based on what index? Thanks, Sandi
|