Re: Revised Nomination

Daren,

FYI. Per our discussion, the following nominations were revised on EOG
Resources:

Meter # Orig Nom Rev Nom Deal #

5263 4,755 5,820 126355
6067 3,726 4,600 126281
6748 2,005 3,300 126360
6742 4,743 10,120 126365
6296 5,733 2,300 126281

Bob

Daren J Farmer
05/31/2000 05:51 PM
To: Robert Cotten/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Revised Nomination - June, 2000

Bob,

Go ahead and accept the nom revision. I believe that this is with PGE, not
El Paso. How do the rest of our noms compare with EOG? I f they have a
higher volume at another meter than we do, I would like to increase our nom
there. In effect, I want to keep our physical index position as close as
possible to what we have in the system now.

D

Enron North America Corp.

From: Robert Cotten 05/31/2000 04:04 PM

To: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Revised Nomination - June, 2000

Daren,

Charlotte Hawkins is having trouble confirming the volume of 5,733 with El
Paso. El Paso will not confirm the volume that high. EOG revised their
nomination as follows:

C/P Name Meter # Orig Nom Rev Nom

EOG Res. 6296 5,733 2,300

Will you approve revising the volume in Unify down to 2,300? Please advise.
Thanks.

Bob