|
|
Enron Mail |
Stephanie,
The problem with the January payment is that the deal is set up incorrectly in sitara. For January production deal 153864 shows HPLC purchasing gas from GMT Company Inc, not GMT Inc. Someone needs to either correct the deal for 1/00 or put in a new deal, then I can do an accounting arrangement to make the necessary correction. It is correct for 2/00 on deal 156292. I emailed Daren on this because I see his name in sitara as the contact, but I am not sure who actually takes care of it. ---------------------- Forwarded by Sherlyn Schumack/HOU/ECT on 03/22/2000 10:27 AM --------------------------- From: Thu Nguyen 03/20/2000 03:07 PM To: Sherlyn Schumack/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Stephanie Gomes/HOU/ECT@ECT Subject: Meter # 0989814 - GMT, Inc. - 1/00 production Sherlyn, I believe this is your meter........ ---------------------- Forwarded by Thu Nguyen/HOU/ECT on 03/20/2000 03:05 PM --------------------------- From: Stephanie Gomes 03/18/2000 09:21 AM To: Thu Nguyen/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Subject: Meter # 0989814 - GMT, Inc. - 1/00 production Thu, I'm not sure if this is your meter or not. If it is not, could you please pass this email on to the correct person. For meter # 9814, Jan. 2000 production, the volume was allocated to the wrong company. The gas was allocated to GMT Company Inc., but it should have been allocated to GMT, Inc. For Feb. 2000 it is done correctly. I need to recoup the money from GMT Company, so could you please let me know when the change has been made in the system. Thanks for your help. Stephanie ( 3-6004 ) ---------------------- Forwarded by Stephanie Gomes/HOU/ECT on 03/18/2000 09:09 AM --------------------------- Nick Moshou@ENRON 03/15/2000 03:25 PM To: Stephanie Gomes/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Subject: Re: GMT, Inc. Tillison #1 Here you go let me know if you need anything else. ---------------------- Forwarded by Nick Moshou/Corp/Enron on 03/15/2000 03:22 PM --------------------------- From: George Weissman @ ECT 03/06/2000 10:34 AM To: Nick Moshou/Corp/Enron@ENRON cc: Brian M Riley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Melissa Graves/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cynthia Hakemack/HOU/ECT@ECT Subject: Re: GMT, Inc. Tillison #1 Would you please send a note to Brian Riley verifying that the GMT payment has gone out to the Houston company? Please include the amount. George x3-6992 ---------------------- Forwarded by George Weissman/HOU/ECT on 03/06/2000 10:20 AM --------------------------- Enron North America Corp. From: George Weissman 03/03/2000 04:18 PM To: Nick Moshou/Corp/Enron@ENRON cc: Brian M Riley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Melissa Graves/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cynthia Hakemack/HOU/ECT@ECT Subject: Re: GMT, Inc. Tillison #1 Nick, it appears that we paid GMT Company, Inc. (BA 01474) of Corpus Christi instead of GMT, Inc. (BA 75046) of Houston. These companies are not related. We should pay the Houston GMT for production at meter 098-9814. Would you please make the necessary adjustments? Thanks. George x3-6992 ---------------------- Forwarded by George Weissman/HOU/ECT on 03/03/2000 04:14 PM --------------------------- Nick Moshou@ENRON 03/03/2000 03:00 PM To: George Weissman/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Subject: Re: GMT, Inc. Tillison #1 I was looking in Unify for last month and this invoice was finalled under the GMT Company Inc for 15975 mmbtu at meter 0989814. The check was sent to their Corpus Christi address. The Sitara# was 153864. The Sitara # you gave me is showing February as the beginning month with GMT, Inc. as the payee. Do you know if these are different companies? ---------------------- Forwarded by Nick Moshou/Corp/Enron on 03/03/2000 02:25 PM --------------------------- Cynthia Hakemack@ECT 03/02/2000 04:07 PM To: Nick Moshou/Corp/Enron@ENRON cc: George Weissman/HOU/ECT@ECT Subject: Re: GMT, Inc. Tillison #1 Nick, Can you please handle this? ---------------------- Forwarded by Cynthia Hakemack/HOU/ECT on 03/02/2000 03:58 PM --------------------------- Enron North America Corp. From: George Weissman 03/02/2000 02:21 PM To: Cynthia Hakemack/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Melissa Graves/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brian M Riley/HOU/ECT@ECT Subject: Re: GMT, Inc. Tillison #1 Cindy, GMT has advised Brian that they have not yet received payment for production at meter 098-9814 for the period from 1/14/2000 to 1/31/2000. Would you look into this and have them paid as promptly as possible? It appears that the January deal was 156292 and I believe GMT produced 15,984 Mmbtu in January. George x3-6992 ---------------------- Forwarded by George Weissman/HOU/ECT on 03/02/2000 02:16 PM --------------------------- Enron North America Corp. From: George Weissman 01/13/2000 09:11 AM To: Vicente Sarmiento/GCO/Enron@Enron cc: Brian M Riley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert D Morgan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Melissa Graves/HOU/ECT@ECT, Nathan L Hlavaty/HOU/ECT@ECT Subject: Re: GMT, Inc. Tillison #1 Vic, attached is a Physical Well Connect form authorizing you to turn-on the GMT Tillison #1 well. We expect this production to commence either late today or tomorrow at Meter 098-9814. Nathan, WO C59605 on its way to you. George x3-6992 ---------------------- Forwarded by George Weissman/HOU/ECT on 01/13/2000 09:01 AM --------------------------- Enron North America Corp. From: George Weissman 01/13/2000 07:45 AM To: Brian M Riley/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Robert D Morgan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Vicente Sarmiento/GCO/Enron@Enron Subject: Re: GMT, Inc. Tillison #1 Brian, for your information. Please note Robert's cautionary warning with respect to additional wells that GMT may want to drill and add to this meter. Does GMT have additional drilling plans? If so, should we alert them to the gas quality issue early on? George x3-6992 ---------------------- Forwarded by George Weissman/HOU/ECT on 01/13/2000 07:41 AM --------------------------- Robert D Morgan 01/12/2000 10:04 AM To: George Weissman/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Subject: Re: GMT, Inc. Tillison #1 Although the gas is non-spec, the volumes and gas total inerts are low enough that it can be blended okay before reaching Beaumont. GO FOR IT. As a precaution, we are starting a trend and I want to be very cautious. Once we connect a well, we can't go backwards. Please be specific with GMT and limit him to this one well. Otherwise he could drill more wells and flow them ALL through this new meter.
|