Enron Mail

From:sherlyn.schumack@enron.com
To:kyle.lilly@enron.com, gregory.steagall@enron.com
Subject:PG&E Texas contract 5095-037 for 2/00
Cc:stacey.neuweiler@enron.com, daren.farmer@enron.com, howard.camp@enron.com
Bcc:stacey.neuweiler@enron.com, daren.farmer@enron.com, howard.camp@enron.com
Date:Tue, 28 Mar 2000 01:19:00 -0800 (PST)

Kyle and Greg this issue is still unresolved as well as a 6,000 variance on
contract 5098-695. I have provided Stacey with the daily allocation from
PG&E Texas. On Friday she told me she did have an answer yet, and she could
not give me a time frame of when she would be able to get to it. She said
we have to understand their staff is short, and if anyone has any questions
to call her or Daren direct. At this time I still do not have an answer, but
will let you know as soon as I do.




---------------------- Forwarded by Sherlyn Schumack/HOU/ECT on 03/28/2000
09:12 AM ---------------------------



From: Sherlyn Schumack 03/22/2000 10:05 AM


To: Stacey Neuweiler/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: PG&E Texas contract 5095-037 for 2/00

Stacey,

The actuals on this contract did not come in as scheduled. The scheduled
deliveries at Texoma are 374,503, but the actuals are 352,568. At Teco Waha
delivery you have 359,120 scheduled, but the actuals are 368,115. I don't
know what numbers you confirmed with PG&E Texas, so can you let me know first
if you agree with PG&E Texas numbers and if you do, will you please make the
necessary changes in unify.

Thanks.