Enron Mail

From:elizabeth.hernandez@enron.com
To:daren.farmer@enron.com
Subject:Pricing Issue for 5/00 production - Duke Energy
Cc:
Bcc:
Date:Fri, 1 Sep 2000 00:49:00 -0700 (PDT)

You probably haven't had time to look at the Duke Energy price. When you get
a chance could you please let me know what the correct price is for May 2000
production.

---------------------- Forwarded by Elizabeth L Hernandez/HOU/ECT on
09/01/2000 07:48 AM ---------------------------



From: Stephanie Gomes 08/30/2000 08:48 AM


To: Elizabeth L Hernandez/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Pricing Issue for 5/00 production - Duke Energy

Elizabeth,
Sorry, I can't remember if we had talked about this pricing issue or what.
Were you looking into this issue for me or was it passed to someone else.
Please see the email below. I believe the system is pulling in the wrong
price for WAHA.WTX.IF.M.I.. for 5/00 production. The deal # is 250237.
I looked at the publication and it shows that the price should be $2.95.
The price of $2.95 plus $1 would equal the price of $2.96 which is what Duke
is
claiming the price to be instead of what we are showing which is $3.95.

Thanks, Stephanie ( 3-6004 )


---------------------- Forwarded by Stephanie Gomes/HOU/ECT on 08/30/2000
08:42 AM ---------------------------



From: Stephanie Gomes 08/28/2000 01:58 PM


To: Elizabeth L Hernandez/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Pricing Issue for 7/00 production

Elizabeth,
I have a pricing discrepancy and I was not sure if I send this to you or
Oneil.
It's for Duke Energy, 5/00 production, deal # 250237. Duke believes our
price is too high. The system downloaded a price of $3.95
The price should be WAHA.WTX.IF.M.I. , which is $2.95 for that month. (
WAHA.WTX.IF.M.I. + 1 ) Duke believes we should have paid them $2.96.
I think the system pulled in the wrong price. Could you please let me know
if you handle this pricing issue or someone else?

Thanks, Stephanie ( 3-6004 )