Enron Mail

From:gary.anderson@enron.com
To:gary.hanks@enron.com
Subject:Re: Brandywine Meter #: 981225 ; March, 2000 Activity
Cc:lee.papayoti@enron.com, robert.lloyd@enron.com, pat.clynes@enron.com,earl.tisdale@enron.com, rita.wynne@enron.com, howard.camp@enron.com, daren.farmer@enron.com, james.mckay@enron.com, pat.flavin@enron.com, cheryl.jones@enron.com, peggy.cameron@enron.
Bcc:lee.papayoti@enron.com, robert.lloyd@enron.com, pat.clynes@enron.com,earl.tisdale@enron.com, rita.wynne@enron.com, howard.camp@enron.com, daren.farmer@enron.com, james.mckay@enron.com, pat.flavin@enron.com, cheryl.jones@enron.com, peggy.cameron@enron.
Date:Thu, 13 Apr 2000 07:37:00 -0700 (PDT)

Just to set the record straight, Measurement was not contacted nor informed
that the recorded flow was inaccurate. We are dependent on the field to
verify measurement information, and absent information to the contrary, the
recorded volumes were published. The HMS technician , Charlie Speigel, was
contacted today , and this issue was discussed and verified that he
neglected to notify GMS of the erroneous recorded flow. We will correct the
statements to reflect zero flow based on this discussion.





From: Gary A Hanks @ ECT 04/13/2000 12:50 PM


To: Lee L Papayoti/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert E Lloyd/HOU/ECT@ECT, Pat
Clynes/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Earl Tisdale/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Rita Wynne/HOU/ECT@ECT, Howard B Camp/HOU/ECT@ECT, Daren J
Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT, James McKay/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gary Anderson/GPGFIN/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Brandywine Meter #: 981225 ; March, 2000 Activity

There was no flow at meter 981225 for the month of March. The HMS technician
did contact measurement once to get the volumes zeroed out but apparently he
will have to get with them again. I have notified the tech and he is in the
process of doing this.

The meter is set on pressure control and the valve is open. Gas Control's
understanding and the field's understanding is that at the time the
Brandywine deal ended some sort of standby agreement was in place. If this
is not the case please let me know and we will notify the plant and close the
valve.

Robert,
In the future if you have meters like this where there is a small flow
volume without a nomination in place please check with Earl and myself so we
can investigate before we get commercial involved.

Thanks
Gary H
---------------------- Forwarded by Gary A Hanks/HOU/ECT on 04/13/2000 12:35
PM ---------------------------
From: Lee L Papayoti on 04/12/2000 05:38 PM
To: Gary A Hanks/HOU/ECT@ECT, James McKay/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Robert E Lloyd/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Brandywine Meter #: 981225 ; March, 2000 Activity

How is this meter set up? Why would it have flowed in March? Any ideas? Is
it on pressure control? If so, what's the set point? I need to know before
I can go to Oxy and/or DuPont and make a claim ....


---------------------- Forwarded by Lee L Papayoti/HOU/ECT on 04/12/2000
05:37 PM ---------------------------



From: Robert E Lloyd 04/12/2000 05:20 PM


To: Lee L Papayoti/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Pat Clynes/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Rita
Wynne/HOU/ECT@ECT, Howard B Camp/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Brandywine Meter #: 981225 ; March, 2000 Activity



Attached is support that indicate gas flowed on a Zero nomination during the
month of March, 2000.

There is no deal in place to allocate this gas flow.

Please advise me how you want this activity allocated.