|
|
Enron Mail |
On day 5 in MOPS (HPL/ENA) there is a delivery nom of 10.0 pathed to the ENA
201 K. On day 16 in MOPS (HPL/ENA) there is not a deal (which is strange because day 16 in POPS references Adonis). The deal on the 5th was a swing deal. Daren J Farmer 08/23/2000 12:59 PM To: Jackie Young/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Subject: Meter 984132 for 1/16/99 Jackie, What does MOPS show for the days in question? It would be incorrect to add any days to the Adonis ticket mentioned below. It sounds as if the meter was allocated incorrectly in POPS and/or a deal was not pathed correctly in MOPS. Let me know what you find in MOPS. D ---------------------- Forwarded by Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT on 08/23/2000 12:54 PM --------------------------- Enron North America Corp. From: Gary W Lamphier 08/22/2000 02:51 PM To: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Subject: Meter 984132 for 1/16/99 ---------------------- Forwarded by Gary W Lamphier/HOU/ECT on 08/22/2000 02:51 PM --------------------------- From: Sherlyn Schumack 08/22/2000 02:07 PM To: Jackie Young/HOU/ECT@ECT, Karen Lindley/Corp/Enron@ENRON cc: Gary W Lamphier/HOU/ECT@ECT Subject: Meter 984132 for 1/16/99 Here is the issue for 1/16/99 at meter 984132. 20,000 mmbtu were confirmed for Adonis in POPS. 10,000 mmbtu on day 5 and day 16. Day 16 is not valid for deal 51862 (track id 6155), which is where 10,000 was confirmed. The actual sale to Adonis was 10,000 which was invoiced and paid by Adonis. We are trying to clear the feedback error report. My question is why was 10,000 confirmed on 1/16/99 if the date is not valid for the deal? When Karen allocates the actual 10,000 it is prorating 5,000 for each day that is confirmed (the 5th and 16th). Should the whole 10,000 be allocated to the 5th or should 5,000 be allocated to each day? If 5,000 should be allocated to each day, the 16th needs to be added to the deal.
|