|
|
Enron Mail |
fyi
---------------------- Forwarded by Michael Eiben/HOU/ECT on 03/21/2000 04:18 PM --------------------------- Gary Anderson@ENRON on 03/21/2000 02:25:52 PM To: Michael Eiben/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Jeff May/GPGFIN/Enron@ENRON, Charlotte Hawkins/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert E Lloyd/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gary A Hanks/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lauri A Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT, George Grant/HOU/ECT@ECT, Pat Clynes/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Steve Venturatos/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brenda F Herod/HOU/ECT@ECT Subject: Re: PG&E Texoma Volumes This is an outside measured volume that we don't receive volumes on until month's end so systematically, no information equals zero. SPI, the software vendor for MIPS is investigating all of the rules currently in place for file transfers, particularly 0 volumes. The only possible solution is to tag all zero volumes sent in the nightly file process as (i) incomplete. I will let you know the outcome of this investigation and the monies required to complete. We may require a work order to complete based on the outcome of the investigation. Michael Eiben@ECT 03/21/2000 10:50 AM To: Jeff May/GPGFIN/Enron@ENRON, Gary Anderson/GPGFIN/Enron@ENRON cc: Charlotte Hawkins/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert E Lloyd/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gary A Hanks/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lauri A Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT, George Grant/HOU/ECT@ECT, Pat Clynes/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Steve Venturatos/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brenda F Herod/HOU/ECT@ECT Subject: PG&E Texoma Volumes Jeff/Gary, Where is measurement in the process of sending Pipeline Operations more complete data? We continue to have this problem at various bidirectional meters and meter 980071 below is the latest casuality. When MIPS sends Pipeline Operations a zero prelim, this becomes the best available number and overlays the estimate that Gas Control sends us. When this happens & scheduling doesn't catch to override the zero, the desk's expense is understated. This is causing a huge mess for Texas Operations. What is the plan to move this up on measurements priority list? We need an answer ASAP!! Charlotte, At what other meters are we having this problem? MVE ---------------------- Forwarded by Michael Eiben/HOU/ECT on 03/21/2000 10:30 AM --------------------------- From: Charlotte Hawkins 03/21/2000 09:54 AM To: Jeff May/GPGFIN/Enron@ENRON, Michael Eiben/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Pat Clynes/Corp/Enron@ENRON, George Grant/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert E Lloyd/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gary A Hanks/HOU/ECT@ECT Subject: PG&E Texoma Volumes I spoke with Romeo D'Souza this morning regarding the on-going problem of MIPS feeding zeros to POPS when incomplete data is received. In light of the e-mail below regarding how important it is that we receive accurate data from MIPS .... could you please update me on the status of this correction. Thank you so much. Charlotte Hawkins ---------------------- Forwarded by Charlotte Hawkins/HOU/ECT on 03/21/2000 09:35 AM --------------------------- Lauri A Allen 03/21/2000 09:04 AM To: Robert E Lloyd/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom Acton/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Charlotte Hawkins/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Pat Clynes/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Bryan Hull/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gary A Hanks/HOU/ECT@ECT Subject: PG&E Texoma Volumes In reviewing some of the imbalance numbers, I discovered that Valero Texoma (#71) BAV volumes have not fed into POPS since 3/14 causing an out of balance at the meter in excess of 500,000mm month to date. The more critical part of this problem, however, is that POPS has fed 0 volumes back to Sitara on some of the HPLC deals. This means that these purchase volumes (expenses) have not been picked up in Tom's P&L and are, instead, sitting in UA4. To the extent that the purchase prices vary from the UA4 value, the P&L may take a hit when these actual volumes flow through. I realize that Kim is out and that you guys are stretched thin, however, a problem of this magnitude needs to be addressed as soon as it's discovered. Someone needs to be overriding the 0 volumes so that Sitara is receiving correct information and the P&L is kept as accurate as possible. Please give me a call if you have any questions.
|