Enron Mail

From:karie.hastings@enron.com
To:julie.meyers@enron.com
Subject:Re: Storage Deal 47472 and 60747
Cc:daren.farmer@enron.com
Bcc:daren.farmer@enron.com
Date:Mon, 27 Mar 2000 01:28:00 -0800 (PST)

Julie:

Can you cut off deal 47472 going forward? I am forwarding the message from
Tommy Yanowski. Let me know if this is a problem.

Thanks, Karie (36759)



---------------------- Forwarded by Karie Hastings/HOU/ECT on 03/27/2000
09:25 AM ---------------------------


Enron Technology

From: Tommy J Yanowski 03/27/2000 08:45 AM


To: Karie Hastings/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Julie Meyers/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Storage Deal 47472 and 60747

Karie: Deal number 60747 should be the good deal. Deal number 60747 is an
interruptible storage deal and contract 96016959 is an interruptible
contract. Storage deal 47472 is a firm storage deal. Since it doesn't agree
with the firmness of the contract, I would probably cut off that deal going
forward. - Tommy



KARIE HASTINGS
03/23/2000 05:35 PM
To: Tommy J Yanowski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Julie Meyers/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Storage Deal 47472 and 60747


Tommy:

There are two Storage deals that are using the same contract number. Julie
Meyers believes that deal 47472 is the correct deal, but wants to check with
you first since you put in deal 60747. Let me know when you look at them if
we need to cut off or kill deal 60747.

Thanks,
Karie (36759)

Deal Contract
47472 96016959
60747 96046959