Enron Mail

From:robert.lloyd@enron.com
To:pat.clynes@enron.com
Subject:Re: Valero -- Meter 8018
Cc:daren.farmer@enron.com, robert.lloyd@enron.com
Bcc:daren.farmer@enron.com, robert.lloyd@enron.com
Date:Wed, 30 Aug 2000 02:45:00 -0700 (PDT)

Does it make a difference if the information is communicated via a copy of
customer "force majeure" letter or should it only be communicated
via notes mail.

There are several ways to communicate effectively issues that is beneficial
to other departments, do you have a preference?



Enron North America Corp.

From: Pat Clynes @ ENRON 08/29/2000 10:13 PM


To: Robert E Lloyd/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Valero -- Meter 8018

Robert,
This is an idea of the type of information that should be communicated.
Thanks, Pat



Daren J Farmer@ECT
01/27/2000 03:23 PM
To: Robert E Lloyd/HOU/ECT@ECT, Pat Clynes/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Valero -- Meter 8018

FYI. We need to make sure that this kind of communication conitinues to flow
downstream.

D
---------------------- Forwarded by Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT on 01/27/2000
03:22 PM ---------------------------
Kenneth Seaman 01/27/2000 02:00 PM

To: Fred Boas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joanie H Ngo/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert E
Lloyd/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Howard B Camp/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Valero -- Meter 8018

Deliveries to this meter were halted late in the day of January 20. The
customer has maintenance issues that necessitated an earlier than planned
turnaround.

It is my understanding from our trader this is another force majure situation
resulting in no sale or buyback at this meter commencing with the shutdown.

Please take this into consideration when allocating and billing the customer.

Thanks