Re: Sitara Release (Re: Changes in Global due to Consent to

Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: Daren J Farmer
X-To: Pat Clynes, Stacey Neuweiler, Ami Chokshi
X-cc:
X-bcc:
X-Folder: \Darren_Farmer_Dec2000\Notes Folders\Sent
X-Origin: Farmer-D
X-FileName: dfarmer.nsf

---------------------- Forwarded by Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT on 04/06/2000
07:30 AM ---------------------------

Mark McClure
04/05/2000 02:55 PM
To: Donna Greif/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Robert Superty/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kathryn Bussell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert
Cotten/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gary L Payne/HOU/ECT@ECT, Richard Pinion/HOU/ECT@ECT,
George Smith/HOU/ECT@ECT, Katherine L Kelly/HOU/ECT@ECT, Randall L
Gay/HOU/ECT@ECT, Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Edward Terry/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bryce
Baxter/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Sitara Release (Re: Changes in Global due to Consent to
Assignment)

Volume Management should be fine with this change. All name changes will be
still attached to the original path of the Buy/Sell deal. The Settlement
Group will have to make sure that the new name that is being added to the
deal has the appropriate 'Statement Group' attached. Other than that this
change should flow smoothly.

Thanks,
m.m.

From: Donna Greif
04/05/2000 01:18 PM

To: Kathryn Bussell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert Cotten/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark
McClure/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gary L Payne/HOU/ECT, Richard Pinion/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert
Superty/HOU/ECT@ECT, George Smith/HOU/ECT@ECT, Katherine L Kelly/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Randall L Gay/HOU/ECT@ECT, Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Edward
Terry/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Dave Nommensen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Diane E Niestrath/HOU/ECT@ECT, Carrie
Hollomon/HOU/ECT@ect, Bryce Baxter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kathryn Cordes/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Dana Daigle/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Elizabeth L Hernandez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Julie
Meyers/HOU/ECT@ECT, B Scott Palmer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stephanie Sever/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Dianne J Swiber/HOU/ECT@ECT, Peggy Hedstrom/CAL/ECT@ECT, Dianne
Seib/CAL/ECT@ECT, Sylvia A Campos/HOU/ECT@ECT, Linda S Bryan/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Faye Ellis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Donna Consemiu/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott Mills/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Russ Severson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Martha Stevens/HOU/ECT@ECT, Karie
Hastings/HOU/ECT@ECT, Regina Perkins/HOU/ECT@ECT, Imelda Frayre/HOU/ECT@ECT,
William E Kasemervisz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Hunaid Engineer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steven
Gullion/HOU/ECT@ECT, Larrissa Sharma/HOU/ECT@ECT, Thomas Engel/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Sitara Release (Re: Changes in Global due to Consent to
Assignment)

FYI....

This change went in for the Deal Validation group. It gives them the
ability to change counterparties names after bridge back.

Impact to Logistics - Unify
If a counterparty name change takes place to deals that have been bridge
backed, it could cause problems on EDI pipes as that new counterparty name
will flow over to Unify and repathing should eventually take place.
One problem may be with the Imbalance data sets, which are not in production
yet......(EDI Imbalance Qtys would not match up to paths)
This may also cause an issue with the scheduled quantities (especially where
nominations were sent for entire month)
can't remember the rules on this one, but I think Unify does have some safe
guards (idiot proofs) to force re-pathing.
Unify does have the ability to over-ride duns numbers, yet would still cause
an additional step for EDI the scheduler would need to think through in order
to get a clean quick response.
What are (if any) impacts to Vol Mgt if counterparty name changes take
place? (prior periods? re-pathing?)

I have a call into Diane and Dave both. After speaking w/ them, hopefully I
can get a clear understanding of the true impact. I am sure we'll need to
put some processes and procedures together for Deal Validation to follow when
these type of changes are needed.

Will keep you posted.

Thanks,

dg

From: Thomas Engel 04/05/2000 09:44 AM

To: Kathryn Cordes/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dana Daigle/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Elizabeth L
Hernandez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Julie Meyers/HOU/ECT@ECT, B Scott Palmer/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Stephanie Sever/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dianne J Swiber/HOU/ECT@ECT, Peggy
Hedstrom/CAL/ECT@ECT, Dianne Seib/CAL/ECT@ECT
cc: Sylvia A Campos/HOU/ECT@ECT, Linda S Bryan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Faye
Ellis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Donna Consemiu/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott Mills/HOU/ECT@ECT, Russ
Severson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Martha Stevens/HOU/ECT@ECT, Karie Hastings/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Regina Perkins/HOU/ECT@ECT, Imelda Frayre/HOU/ECT@ECT, William E
Kasemervisz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Hunaid Engineer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steven
Gullion/HOU/ECT@ECT, Larrissa Sharma/HOU/ECT@ECT, Donna Greif/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Sitara Release (Re: Changes in Global due to Consent to Assignment)

Regarding the ability to change counterparties on deals in SITARA with
confirmed volumes - Tom's words of caution:

If someone calls you and wants to change a counterparty - we created the
ability for you to invalidate the deal - and
then change the counterparty - however - I did add a warning message:

"Warning - changing counterparty on deal with confirmed volumes - make sure
pipeline allows this change."

Some pipelines do not allow us to change counterparties after there is
feedback - I assume for the same reasons
we had this rule - it used to blow up our old scheduling systems
(pre-UNIFY). Some pipelines will require a new
deal and we will have to zero out the old deal.

Before you make the change - make sure the logistics person is aware - just
in case it causes problems with their
pipeline. Sorry - I don't know which pipes these are - you will have to ask
the UNIFY team.

There is one rule still in place - you can change from ENA-IM East to ENA-IM
Market East - but not from
ENA-IM Texas to HPLC-IM HPLC - when changing business units - they must be
the same legal entity.
"Warning - not the same legal entity"

Also - beware of making contract and counterparty changes to Service deals
(Transport Capacity, Storage, Cash Out).
Once the deal is invalidated - there are no rules. Don't forget - the items
were locked down for a reason.
If you invalidate a service deal - and change the previously locked down
data that was validated - and someone used these
deals in UNIFY - it is highly likely that the UNIFY deals and paths created
using these deals will get corrupted. Always check
with someone from UNIFY to make sure no one used these deals for anything in
UNIFY.

---------------------- Forwarded by Thomas Engel/HOU/ECT on 04/05/2000 09:47
AM ---------------------------
From: Scott Mills on 04/04/2000 07:38 PM
To: Kathryn Cordes/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dana Daigle/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Elizabeth L
Hernandez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Julie Meyers/HOU/ECT@ECT, B Scott Palmer/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Stephanie Sever/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dianne J Swiber/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Steve Jackson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Thomas Engel/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sylvia A
Campos/HOU/ECT@ECT, Linda S Bryan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Faye Ellis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Donna
Consemiu/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Sitara Release (Re: Changes in Global due to Consent to Assignment)

With the release that was put out Tuesday evening, Deal Validation should be
able to change the counterparty on deals where the volume is something other
than expected (e.g. confirmed, nominated, scheduled, etc.).

In addition, this release will also capture "near-time" the contract changes
that are made in global. This means that need for server bounces will not be
necessary.

New/Changes to contracts will show up without having to get out of deal
manager.
New Counterparties, and new/changes to facilities will require getting out
of all active Sitara apps (except for launch pad).
Once out of all apps, start a new app - the respective information that you
are looking for will appear.

I mention "near-time" because we are constrained by the amount of time it
takes for the change in Global data to trigger an alert for Sitara who then
updates its information

SRM (x33548)

Cyndie Balfour-Flanagan@ENRON
04/04/2000 03:41 PM
To: Connie Sutton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Linda S Bryan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kathryn
Cordes/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott Mills/HOU/ECT@ECT, Richard Elwood/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dave
Nommensen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kenneth M Harmon/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dana
Daigle/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kathryn Cordes/HOU/ECT@ECT, Elizabeth L
Hernandez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Julie Meyers/HOU/ECT@ECT, B Scott Palmer/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Stephanie Sever/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dianne J Swiber/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gayle
Horn/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Brant Reves/HOU/ECT@ECT, Russell Diamond/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Debbie R Brackett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steve Jackson/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Changes in Global due to Consent to Assignment

The following changes will be made in the Global Contracts database due to
receipt of executed Consent to Assignment for the following contracts:

Current Counterparty Name Contract Type Contract # 'New' Counterparty
Name
CES - Commonwealth Energy Services GISB 96029892 Commonwealth Energy
Services

CES - Samuel Gary Jr. & Associates, Inc GISB 96029302 Samuel Gary Jr. &
Associates

CES - South Jersey Gas Company GISB 96029143 South Jersey Gas Company

CP name change and Contract Type correction (Contract Type different than
that provided by CES)
Per CES
CES - Southwest Gas Corporation 1/1/98 GISB 96029146

Per Contract File
CES - Southwest Gas Corporation 04/14/93 Master Purchase/Sale Interruptible
(will edit Global #96029146)
&
CES - Southwest Gas Corporation 12/01/94 Master Sale Firm (created new
Global record to accommodate this K, #96037402)

Please note that Southwest Gas Corporation has consented to the assignment of
both of these contracts.