|
|
Enron Mail |
fyi
---------------------- Forwarded by Ronald Brzezinski/EWC/Enron on 05/28/2002 05:10 PM --------------------------- Ronald Brzezinski on 05/28/2002 03:49:25 PM To: Klaus Obel/EWC/Enron@Enron cc: Subject: RE: 3200 - Desert Sky: final SCADA Report fyi ---------------------- Forwarded by Ronald Brzezinski/EWC/Enron on 05/28/2002 04:04 PM --------------------------- From: Alaadin Suliman 05/28/2002 03:42 PM To: Ronald Brzezinski/EWC/Enron@ENRON cc: Subject: RE: 3200 - Desert Sky: final SCADA Report ---------------------- Forwarded by Alaadin Suliman/EWC/Enron on 05/28/2002 03:56 PM --------------------------- "Peter Simpson" <simpson@garradhassan.co.uk< on 05/28/2002 01:25:47 PM To: <stanley.ballard@ps.ge.com< cc: <kevin.cousineau@ps.ge.com<, "Alaadin. Suliman" <Alaadin.Suliman@enron.com< Subject: RE: 3200 - Desert Sky: final SCADA Report Stan, I spoke to Alaadin when he was on his way to lunch, earlier today, regarding the content of Section 3 of the Final SCADA Acceptance Test Results report. My question should probably been addressed to you. The question is: why are the screen dumps presented taken from records of April 19, deviant from the data that Alaadin and I witnessed on April 18, as recorded on the typescript sheet 'Met-Mast Data record during SCADA final ATP' that is included in this section of the report? [The latter is correct, with the exception of a typo in the wind speed data for turbine 31: this should read 11.6, not 1.6.] The content of the three tables in Section 1, under the heading of Test 7.0 is erroneous: a) the date should be April 18 and the times should correspond with the records on the typescript sheet; b) a number of wind speed and temperature values do not correspond with those on the typescript sheet. This appears to result from an effort to correlate data from April 19, as it appears on the screen dumps, with data recorded on April 18. I have some comments on the text preceding the tables. I shall write separately regarding that. Peter.
|