|
|
Enron Mail |
Yes, but we are consistenly being OOMC'd, so it's kind of an ongoing question.
Thanks, JMF -----Original Message----- From: "Patterson, Mark" <mpatterson@testmail.ercot.com<@ENRON Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2001 1:18 PM To: Forney, John M. Subject: RE: OOMC Capacity Payments If you are referring to the OOMC for September 14th we are still working on a number of issues pertaining to that trade day. -----Original Message----- From: Forney, John M. [mailto:John.M.Forney@ENRON.com] Sent: Friday, October 12, 2001 11:27 AM To: Mark Patterson (E-mail) Cc: Jerry Watson (E-mail) Subject: OOMC Capacity Payments Mark, Thanks for your reply concerning ancillary service procurement. I was wondering if Ercot had made a decision on OOM capacity payments. Our position is that our custmers, ie. Teco/Frontera should recover at least their O&M expenses for the capacity, as they are standing by awaiting instruction. Has there been any progress in this subject? JForney ********************************************************************** This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise. Thank you. **********************************************************************
|