|
|
Enron Mail |
pls print. thanks df
---------------------- Forwarded by Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron on 08/09/2000 12:03 PM --------------------------- From: Britt Davis on 08/09/2000 11:57 AM To: Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Jim Talcott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Bob Thurber/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Deborah Shahmoradi/NA/Enron@Enron, Brenda McAfee/Corp/Enron@ENRON cc: Subject: Re: Bridenstine Attached for your review is Jim Peters' rough draft. Jim tried to design it in such a way as to be as generic as possible, with the idea that factual differences between the parties would be put in the footnotes. I am concerned he may be overreaching with regard to the legal objection, where he refers to TW/Northern as a "nonresident", given that (as I understand it) Northern and/or TW have facilities in Oklahoma. There are also some grammatical changes that I would make. I wonder if I could get ya'll to take a look at this and have you participate with me in a telephone conference with Jim later this afternoon? If Drew, Jim or Bob could let me know what time would be convenient, I'll get it set up. Many thanks. B.K.D. ----- Forwarded by Britt Davis/Corp/Enron on 08/09/2000 11:22 AM ----- MHBullis@aol.com 08/09/2000 09:59 AM To: Britt.Davis@enron.com, lpain@duke-energy.com, meremmenga@cmsenergy.com cc: Subject: Re: Bridenstine Attached to this email is a proposed draft of a Special Appearance and Objection for your review and approval. Please note Footnote 1 needs your input. Hopefully, we can send the pleading out today but in no event later than tomorrow. Regards, Jim Peters - SPECIA~1.WPD
|